Yeah, I'm not sure either...
One thing I did notice, the mixture of EVOO, LL, and CCO, once mixed, resolved into a khaki coloured mix, rather than the usual black colour. I'm going to wait while she tests out the frozen caps to see how they work... and, when I make a new batch, I'll be doubly careful about water.
Hmmm... water in the mix... I dunno HOW water got into it..
How much water can cause this problem? IF these was water, it would only be a few drops, I think. I mixed up a total of 32 cc's of mixture and there could not have been more than 1 cc of water... probably less.
What about the Lecithin? Is it hygroscopic? I have a large bottle and I transfer some into an eyedropper bottle every few batches, and when its time to use it I put the smaller bottle in a warm water bath to help it move. Maybe, MAYBE, some got dripped into the mix.
She just took one of the frozen caps, so we'll see what affect that may have. She took it orally... she wasn't enthusiastic about shoving a cold, messy, capsule..
Malawi it is. 
Awk! $70 a gram for oil? Geez.......
Are you thinking about exploring fractional distillation Canyon? I'd say it's definately the low and slo GSC.
Time for me to break something out.
Thinking about the differences between sativa and indica, today.
I've heard it said that a basic distinction between sativa and indica strains is their myrcene content, that below some figure and the strain is sativa and above that figure the strain is indica. Fair enough.
But in an ealier post here (#4608) I cited graphs demonstrating how oven decarboxylation removes practically all the terpene content. So if we compare two strains having similar CBD and THC content, one a sativa and the other an indica, then after the decarb their terpene differences apparently become practically insignificant.
So how do we account for the big differences typically felt when medicating with a decarbed sativa compared with medicating with a decarbed indica, the two being chosen to have similar CBD and THC figures (for the purpose of this discussion, anyway)? With their terpenes gone, any difference must lie in the minor cannabinoids. It seems a remarkable coincidence, to me, that the property of having a myrcene content within a defined range should be consistent with having a set minor cannabinoid spectrum to give us this dependable difference. With the two having evolved in different regions of the world, it follows that there may be some surprising differences. So is it known which of the minor cannabinoids are predominately responsible for setting the consistent differences felt between sativa and indica? Perhaps tailoring an oil by boosting it with a few cannabinoid isolates (if obtainable) might bring about improvements, e.g., a lessening of adverse side-effects such as anxiety, couchlock, or paranoia?
Can there be any other explanation to account for the differences between sativa and indica?
On a separate note, with myrcene credited as helping cannabinoids to cross cell membranes, I wonder should it become standard practice to add supplementary myrcene in the preparation of medicinal cannabis oil? After all, the ability to cross cell membranes with ease is, I think, precisely what we want here, and the decarb has removed most of our myrcene.
Thanks.
so when I got back around noon, I immediately baked her cake, and she's fine now... 
Thinking about the differences between sativa and indica, today.
I've heard it said that a basic distinction between sativa and indica strains is their myrcene content, that below some figure and the strain is sativa and above that figure the strain is indica. Fair enough.
But in an ealier post here (#4608) I cited graphs demonstrating how oven decarboxylation removes practically all the terpene content. So if we compare two strains having similar CBD and THC content, one a sativa and the other an indica, then after the decarb their terpene differences apparently become practically insignificant.
So how do we account for the big differences typically felt when medicating with a decarbed sativa compared with medicating with a decarbed indica, the two being chosen to have similar CBD and THC figures (for the purpose of this discussion, anyway)? With their terpenes gone, any difference must lie in the minor cannabinoids. It seems a remarkable coincidence, to me, that the property of having a myrcene content within a defined range should be consistent with having a set minor cannabinoid spectrum to give us this dependable difference. With the two having evolved in different regions of the world, it follows that there may be some surprising differences. So is it known which of the minor cannabinoids are predominately responsible for setting the consistent differences felt between sativa and indica? Perhaps tailoring an oil by boosting it with a few cannabinoid isolates (if obtainable) might bring about improvements, e.g., a lessening of adverse side-effects such as anxiety, couchlock, or paranoia?
Can there be any other explanation to account for the differences between sativa and indica?
On a separate note, with myrcene credited as helping cannabinoids to cross cell membranes, I wonder should it become standard practice to add supplementary myrcene in the preparation of medicinal cannabis oil? After all, the ability to cross cell membranes with ease is, I think, precisely what we want here, and the decarb has removed most of our myrcene.
Thanks.
Had to put the jar right in front of a light, this jar is tinted light blue and still has a real nice Green color.
At first I thought "Too green...." then realized it was through blue glass. Perfect. You're getting to be an old hand at this. 
