- Thread starter
- #101
CBDMed
Well-Known Member
It is crazy here! Even the solo cups are clear!I've never seen a clear bucket here!
This is what I used to start my seeds in back before SIP's!
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is crazy here! Even the solo cups are clear!I've never seen a clear bucket here!
Not very strong at all. A desk lamp will do just fine.How strong of a light do you ideally want?
Not very strong at all. A desk lamp will do just fine.
I suggest that it has nothing to do with the dynomyco and much more to do with the genetics. If the plants aren't small because of some visible deficiency or pests and the lights are the same over all of them, then they're expressing themselves as best as they can. Autos can show a variation in size across the same strain, as they are not just a cross of a number of parents but need to maintain the ruderalis (autoflower) genetics as well.I am wide-open for suggestions.
I suggest that it has nothing to do with the dynomyco and much more to do with the genetics.
If the plants aren't small because of some visible deficiency or pests and the lights are the same over all of them, then they're expressing themselves as best as they can.
Autos can show a variation in size across the same strain, as they are not just a cross of a number of parents but need to maintain the ruderalis (autoflower) genetics as well.
If you have the dark-capability to run photos, why would you ever run autos, especially if you're a medical cannabis user? It would be a much surer bet to harvest your g/day need from a photo over an auto.The other part of me wants to wait and see if I should just put five or six photo seeds, and get this grow on the road.
They might just mean that it does better with a bit less light rather than needing that schedule to flower. Most folks run their autos at 18/6 or 20/4 if only to save money on the electric bill.I have some Top Tao "auto" seeds, but "Mr. Tao" said they need at least six hours of dark (18/6). I do not really understand that. Is there a way I could understand it?
Shed, you did not put me off of autos. From my perspective, you and several others have encouraged and helped me. (And thank you. )I didn't mean to put you off the autos since any harvest is better than empty pots!
Well, I appreciate that. Only, maybe I was not clear. Please let me try again.I just meant that there are very few auto growers who consistently get photo-sized plants from theirs, and it doesn't seem to be repeatable by many folks who try to follow their methods.
It seems like a good question.If you have the dark-capability to run photos, why would you ever run autos,
Good question.especially if you're a medical cannabis user?
As I remember, 5-6 photos used to put out a whopping amount of bud that used to last me all year (I'm not so sure about now.) It would be nice to have 5 foot tall bushes again!It would be a much surer bet to harvest your g/day need from a photo over an auto.
Well, electricity is way cheap here (like $100 for the month, with everything.)They might just mean that it does better with a bit less light rather than needing that schedule to flower. Most folks run their autos at 18/6 or 20/4 if only to save money on the electric bill.
Don't do that! You never know what the weather is going to be like or when they might come in handy again.I suppose I could give them away.
Sounds like marketing to me. And anyway, it's no big deal to run autos at 18/6 anyway with powerful lights.I do not know what to think if "there is a little bit of Ruderalis, but not too much."
I was really thinking about harvest weights. After drying I make note of the g/day above ground, and folks who have a g/day medical target would be wise to do the same. I am sure that you will average a higher g/day with photos than autos over the course of the year.(Or were you thinking mainly about the harvest being larger?)
Whatever you spent on seeds would be less than if you had to buy cannabis to replace what is lost to smaller harvests.I think the main thing is that I hate to waste seeds
You should have some Candida seeds within a few weeks depending on how long things take to get down there.Maybe I could plant the CBD version of Sugar Black Rose. That should have lots of terpenes.
Well, that is true. If my landlady sells the place, I could be back to no-indoor grow room... (I hope not!)Don't do that! You never know what the weather is going to be like or when they might come in handy again.
Yeah. But to be practical I should probably save those seeds also (as they are semi-auto), and switch straight to photos.Sounds like marketing to me. And anyway, it's no big deal to run autos at 18/6 anyway with powerful lights.
Oh!I was really thinking about harvest weights. After drying I make note of the g/day above ground, and folks who have a g/day medical target would be wise to do the same. I am sure that you will average a higher g/day with photos than autos over the course of the year.
Well, that is true. Thankfully I do not have to buy it anymore, because they have some crazy rules here.Whatever you spent on seeds would be less than if you had to buy cannabis to replace what is lost to smaller harvests.
You should have some Candida seeds within a few weeks depending on how long things take to get down there.
I will be interested to hear.I'm currently testing a canola oil spray for powdery mildew which shows some promise, but I haven't had a chance to test it on anything in flower yet. That will be later this summer after I flip.
I think I am getting a happy picture, thanks!How many you need depends om how much time you have! If you have lots of time you could buy one, make a mother plant out of it, and cut clones on an ongoing basis. But if you need to harvest short term then you'd buy as many as you need plants to harvest. Then as they grow you'd cut clones from the ones you want to keep around for the next grow.
Or any variation of that scenario!