Everything is looking great as usual Smokey!
I've wondered this for a while but never asked, how much difference is there between a recharge and an amendment? We add the recharge to the soil around week 3 of flower without any concerns but if we amend the soil it has to cook. The cooking process is toxic until it is all broken down so why isn't the recharge toxic for a period of time?? Maybe this should go into the Q&A?
The recharge isn't quite the same as the amendment but it's very, very similar in that it includes everything in the amendment PLUS some other things. The third run a amendment is quite a bit different, but the "kit" components are quite similar with some other stuff added to the recharge as noted.
The reason it doesn't need to cook and can be top dressed is because the roots are already established and the minerals are going to slowly work their way into the soil from the top, where they will be greeted by a robust and hungry biota.
The "toxic" part can be seen in the crust that forms on top of the soil a few days after giving the recharge.
Now, someone is going to read this post, fixate on the word "Toxic" and then go out and through sheer ignorance start saying, "Doc Bud's kit is toxic." First of all, Fuck them. (they'll do it soon enough) Secondly, it's not "toxic" like kerosene or bleach....it's just that plants won't grow in the crust, which is great for weed control and wind erosion. But it takes time for those minerals to combine and so forth which is why we wait a month.
It's not the same for plants that are already well established.
Again, we're using natural, organic substances. When the phosphorus and calcium combine at first they create a battery, and the electrostatic charges in the various minerals cause a crust to form. That crust won't germ seeds and won't allow roots to grow very well, but what's going on under the soil continues just fine.