@TorturedSoul, that’s twice in half an hour I’ve been stunned at the knowledge you’re carrying around in that head of yours.
LMAO. You can put 642 slugs along with one quarter into a piggy bank, and if you turn it upside down and shake it often enough, sooner or later it'll spit out something useful.
Following how-to instructions, that's fine. For the really dense, it is probably a requirement
. For those willing to figure out how and WHY a how-to works, it can serve as a foundation for their (one hopes and assumes) ever-expanding knowledge base. Which is important, IMHO, not just for the possibility of going on to "bigger and better things," but also for those cases when one has conditions or encounters issues that the author of the how-to didn't cover in their instructions.
You can make great meals from great recipes. But some of the things that have been thrown together when a pretty little (typically) brunette and I just had a buzz (whether induced or natural
) going and wandered into the kitchen to assuage one of our appetites...
Magnificent (usually) - and on the rare occasions when the result left something to be desired, well... dessert was just around the corner - and up a flight of stairs...
Wait a minute!
Are you saying that you mixed up half the recommended dose (1ml/gal instead of 2ml/gal), or did you mix a 50% concentration of the nutrients straight from the bottle? Like, 1 ml of nutes to 2ml water?
You are thinking(?) too much.
I've seen more cases of over-fertilization than under.
There are cannabis (et cetera) toxicity/deficiency charts all over the Internet - including right here in our own forum.
I was once naive and believed the nutrient companies had our best interest at heart.
For-profit business: A business or other organization whose
primary goal is making money (a profit), as opposed to a non profit organization which focuses a goal such as helping the community and is concerned with money only as much as necessary to keep the organization operating.
When in doubt about the meaning of a term, look it up, lol.
The cost issue isn’t really because of the feeding charts. It’s because of how much they charge for water.
Lol. I was going to make a joke about how maybe they're actually using deuterium oxide ("heavy water") - but then I did a quick check to see how much Cambridge Isotopes currently charges for the stuff. $32 for 60ml
.
I paid up front for my water having a well drilled. Now it's mostly free.
Must be nice. OtOH, last year I read about a guy out west somewhere that jumped at a "really good deal" on well-drilling equipment so he could "save thousands" by drilling his own well in order to get a mortgage on his property. Turned out what he didn't get was... permits. IDK how that worked out; the thread ended with him owing money, getting fined by at least one jurisdiction (state) and possibly a local one, and in danger of losing his property because he was suddenly behind the eight ball on payments (whole reason he initially decided to convert to a mortgage, IIRC).
Water will eventually become our most expensive utility. Probably within most of our lifetimes. We might even end up having TWO water lines - the one that we can (arguably) afford to use, and the other that is (again, arguably) safe to actually drink.
You are paying for all the water they add to dilute the nutrients to the point where you have to use more of their product to get the nutrients you need.
Considering the price difference between dry and "wet" nutrients, even from the same company, one would almost think so.
BtW, I once saw a book at my local library on hydroponics, and it had a good section on mixing up your own hydroponic nutrients from the individual components. The copyright on the book was
1972. It's really NOT rocket science.
What we're actually paying for is convenience. Or laziness, depending on how you want to look at it.