Re: 420 Consumer Reports Competition - Haight Solid State vs. Hydro Grow LED
LOL!
lemme tell ya, it goes a lot slower when you're watchin' the pot .
I've done my best to limit variables to just the lights, and I think I've done a pretty good job of that, so I think the differences in how they look is directly related to the difference in the design of these lights.
It's like when you go looking online for grows of a strain you might be interested in growing because you want to get an idea of how the plants turned out, but the plants in each grow turn out looking very different because of environment.
I think that the design feature that has had the most influence in how the plants look is the difference in lens angles. IMO, the difference in wattage between these lights, and any effect from that, is overshadowed by the effect from the difference in lens angles. It would be really difficult to separate out the wattage factor with two designs as different as these. Also, the higher wattage advantage of the HSS light may not have manifested itself yet.
That extra 54w may kick in later in some way, but I don't think we're going to be able to separate it out.
You're not going to grow plants that look the same with 60 degrees versus 140. It's not going to happen. Plants are very adaptable, especially our beloved MJ, so they're just not going to grow the same under viewing angles that are that different.
What I'm dying to find out is which approach works best for *this* style of grow.
I like to research a strain as thoroughly as I can before I grow it so I can head off any surprises and optimize things as much as I can for the specific needs of that strain.
For me, any specific temperature needs of a strain would take priority over watering frequency issues. The Hindu Kush mountain range has temps that vary a great deal, from intese cold to scorching heat, so Kush strains can tolerate a fairly wide variation in temps.
So VK would probably do fine at 80-85F, but probably not as well as let's say, the African strains.
So, all that to say that I think that as long as the strain can handle the heat, it may be a good strategy to use higher temps to increase watering frequency .
thanks Cephas, I appreciate your comments
Dude those photos are amazing! This is like watching an incredibly slow episode of CSI!
LOL!
lemme tell ya, it goes a lot slower when you're watchin' the pot .
I'm curious about the factors that have contributed to the drastic difference in the plants. Do you have any opinions yet? I would think the HSS would be blowing the HGL away due to its wattage advantage but it isn't. Maybe the lens angles or the LED wavelength selection? Both? Geez, I can't wait for my light to get here so I can start experimenting for myself!
I've done my best to limit variables to just the lights, and I think I've done a pretty good job of that, so I think the differences in how they look is directly related to the difference in the design of these lights.
It's like when you go looking online for grows of a strain you might be interested in growing because you want to get an idea of how the plants turned out, but the plants in each grow turn out looking very different because of environment.
I think that the design feature that has had the most influence in how the plants look is the difference in lens angles. IMO, the difference in wattage between these lights, and any effect from that, is overshadowed by the effect from the difference in lens angles. It would be really difficult to separate out the wattage factor with two designs as different as these. Also, the higher wattage advantage of the HSS light may not have manifested itself yet.
That extra 54w may kick in later in some way, but I don't think we're going to be able to separate it out.
You're not going to grow plants that look the same with 60 degrees versus 140. It's not going to happen. Plants are very adaptable, especially our beloved MJ, so they're just not going to grow the same under viewing angles that are that different.
What I'm dying to find out is which approach works best for *this* style of grow.
I'm also curious what you think about increasing the average temperature in LED grows (not this one, don't change a thing) to 80F-85F in order to increase soil evaporation?
I like to research a strain as thoroughly as I can before I grow it so I can head off any surprises and optimize things as much as I can for the specific needs of that strain.
For me, any specific temperature needs of a strain would take priority over watering frequency issues. The Hindu Kush mountain range has temps that vary a great deal, from intese cold to scorching heat, so Kush strains can tolerate a fairly wide variation in temps.
So VK would probably do fine at 80-85F, but probably not as well as let's say, the African strains.
So, all that to say that I think that as long as the strain can handle the heat, it may be a good strategy to use higher temps to increase watering frequency .
thanks Cephas, I appreciate your comments