Dennise
Well-Known Member
re: KingJohnC's Lush Lighting LED Dominator 2x Soil Indoor Grow Journal & Review
Lovely King ...
Lovely King ...
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what is normal finishing times for these strains?
and for the finish: at 24in away from the HPS (current peak of my canopy) the max temp is 79 degrees. So I'm comfortable saying that I can get as close as 12-14 inches of my cooltube without stressing the ladies out.For those asking about HPS temps: here's what I have so far from a 600W cooltube with an HPS bulb, high of 84 at 41 inches away from center of bulb and a high of 90 at 8 inches away. I'm measuring from 16 inches away today - let me know if you'd like to see any other specific distances.
Ready for this? at 16in away the high is 82 deg so it looks like that's a sweet spot in my setup for air flow since it's even cooler than at 41 inches away.
Alaskan Thunder is also know as Matanuska Thunder.
The ignorance of some people astounds me. Going to be brief as KJC's thread, but ignorance like this can not be ignored.
1. Coal companies are not being bankrupt, they are actually doing very well with their profits the last 5-10 years.
2. Human caused climate change is a much a scientific fact as something like say, evolution.
If anyone would like to show their ignorance to these two facts, then bring it to my thread and show me your denier bs there and I will refute it with actual science.
Buds are coming along well KJC! Good job for first grow under LED, what is normal finishing times for these strains?
We'll just have to agree to disagree and enjoy our mutual love of the cannabis plant. It's the things that bring us together that make our society stronger, wouldn't you agree? Sorry for the interruption John. &
The AK48's have grown very well under the Lush Lighting Dominator 2x and the tallest has grown to 9" from the LED light panel. I had expected the AK48's to grow to the same height as the Hindu Kush #3.
Flower Day 39
All plants were given a foliar spray with 5 millilitre per gallon of Snow Storm Ultra.
https://emeraldtriangle.biz
https://www.perfectgardens.com emerald triangle snow storm ultra qt
That is interesting, cause I am developing a theory that different strains perform differently under different lighting. I have noticed, no data just a probably meaningless observation, that in my test grow the delta in the two sides between the two differing LEDs is different for the two strains, Blueberry and Hawaiian Snow. And this may be another piece of subjective evidence backing up that thought.
If true that could greatly complicate the discussion on 'best' LED panel.
You are right about different lights causing different reactions in plants. There are two main types of parts of plants that respond to light and cause these reactions, you have photosynthetic pigments, and photosynthetic proteins.
Photosynthetic proteins respond to different changes in light to help the plants cope with environmental conditions. There are many different proteins that only respond to certain wavelengths of light. Some of these are responsible for sensing changes in UV radiation and help initiate protective responses in plants, others help respond to IR and Green light combinations and tell the plants to stretch which is how plants push themselves out of shade (primarily green and IR light).
Then you have the Photosynthtic Pigments, which are mainly used for gathering light energy, and helping convert it to other vital plant processes. This is your chlorophylls, cartenoids, and such. Each of these responds to different light wavelenths and mostly are involved in electron transfer to the photosystems to convert light photons to energy. But, they also do trigger plant responses as well and many of the carotenoids are also responsible for triggering plant responses to different changing light.
Light definitely affects plants in many ways, and this is where the arguements seem to start in the lighting world.. and from my research this actually carries over to the scientific field as many of the studies are heavily debated and many times conflicting. Plant lighting is one of the most studied but also most conflicting areas of study in plants, and we still have so much to know about these individual proteins and pigments and their full functions and reactions.
Great observation, I hope you guys don't mind me confirming what you were saying
Pertaining to the green(525nm) light wavelength, I have been doing a lot of reading on this subject since I came across an article linking the 525nm wavelength to shorter node stretching, and would be interested in an experiment of running a green light during the sleep cycle to see how it would effect node stretch.
Do you think it would increase or decrease stretch?
The result is consistent with a growing body of
evidence that green light signals oppose responses
generated by the activation of blue and red photo-
sensory pathways. The opposition of a normal light
response by green light has been observed in other
contexts. Green light delivered coincidently with blue
light eliminates stomatal opening (Frechilla et al., 2000).
The addition of green light to a red and blue background
decreases seedling dry mass (Went, 1957). Green light
also increases stem growth rate in the developing seed-
ling (Folta, 2004), whereas all other wavebands (includ-
ing far red) promote growth inhibition (Parks et al., 2001;
Shinkle et al., 2004). The addition of green wavebands
has been shown to reverse blue light-induced effects
on hypocotyl elongation and anthocyanin accumula-
tion in seedlings (Bouly et al., 2007) as well as to affect
flowering (Banerjee et al., 2007). The results herein
represent another example of how the addition of
green light opposes responses induced by other vis-
ible wavelengths