Re: 420 Consumer Reports Competition - Haight Solid State vs. Hydro Grow LED
thanks!
Thanks for explaining. That seems like an interesting and useful parameter, so I'll do my best. My usual sequence is chop, trim large fans, snip buds off main stem and dry until ready to jar and cure.
If I saved the main stem for later weighing, would that work, or does the plant need to dry intact?
OK, and how would I know when I'm at or approaching that line?
On that chart, between "deficiency" and "optimum", there's some wiggle room, so are you saying that as long as there aren't any frank signs of deficiency, it makes no difference where you're at in that zone?
I find it hard to believe that plants would respond and grow the same within the boundaries of that range, although the vitamin analogy with humans that Soniq mentioned does help.
thanks!
Good stuff!
thanks, I hope this grow will be useful to the community
Thanx, man the ladies are looking luscious.
thanks!
I don't know how you cure, if, for some reason you hang whole plants, the total dry weight/plant would give better #s, but wet weight wiil work. In very simple English, I'm looking to measure the ratio of finished product to total [above ground] plant mass. I call it the treasure/trash ratio. We smoke bud, not stix or leaves, the ratio gives you the percent of total plant mass that is bud, a measure of productive efficiency. I want to grow as much treasure and as little trash as possible. This is why I want to breed my purple dwarf, she don't waste time and energy making stix. The grams/watt-hr calc. measures how efficient we are growing bud in terms of electricity I want to measure how efficient the plant is in growing bud, and this calc. does that.
Thanks for explaining. That seems like an interesting and useful parameter, so I'll do my best. My usual sequence is chop, trim large fans, snip buds off main stem and dry until ready to jar and cure.
If I saved the main stem for later weighing, would that work, or does the plant need to dry intact?
With regards to your nuteburn,
More is not better past a point, the flat part of the curve represents luxury consuption [waste] and once you begin downsloping on the right, you're doing damage [and wasting $]. IMO, the middle of the curve is the [optimum] place to be, not too much waste, not borderline over or under. This curve applies for all parameters, and is useful in decision making. [If you want to really fine tune, the vertical line marking the point of diminshing returns on the left is a good upper limit.]
OK, and how would I know when I'm at or approaching that line?
On that chart, between "deficiency" and "optimum", there's some wiggle room, so are you saying that as long as there aren't any frank signs of deficiency, it makes no difference where you're at in that zone?
I find it hard to believe that plants would respond and grow the same within the boundaries of that range, although the vitamin analogy with humans that Soniq mentioned does help.
thanks!
Good stuff!
thanx again for this, your doing a public service.
thanks, I hope this grow will be useful to the community