300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

Quite an amount of replies there, Setting Sun! Has to be record of some sorts.

Thanks again, as we do appreciate the info!
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

Quite an amount of replies there, Setting Sun! Has to be record of some sorts.

Thanks again, as we do appreciate the info!


I type pretty fast, and I think the majority of posts deserve individual replies, but I'm glad you brought this up, because in order to have more balance in my life, address other important things, and stay healthy, I'm going to approach journals somewhat differently.

A good friend with clear vision suggested that I do a weekly update with pics and comments, and reminded me that there are many growers here who are perfectly capable of answering questions besides me ;). This being as much revelation as remembrance, makes me very grateful for good friends.

that's the plan ;)
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

just wanted to share some info, i stopped Ph'ing my water a long time ago on my DM red plants just R/O water and cal/mag and the girls are very happy. might want to give it a try maybe sometime:thumb:.


That is very good to know, because like you, I hate PH'ing, but at least if I use a consistent source, like RO, I can work out the numbers so that I don't have to break my meter out every time I water.

With RO, after adding 5-10ml of cal-mag, it takes 0.5ml of PH down to bring the solution down to 6.5, and 1.0ml of PH down to bring it down to 6.0, so as long as the water is consistent, this works fine for me and isn't that much work.

It would be even better to avoid adding PH down, however, so thanks for sharing that bro.

My plants have been doing *far* better since I stopped using our hard tap water and started using RO or rainwater with cal-mag.

I'm jealous of peeps with decent tap water, but at least I finally figured out why my plants always needed flushing during the course of a grow, even when I didn't over-nute.
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

Those are called rose pots or rose buckets, and they're 1.75 gal.

Pots/ Containers - - Rose Bucket


They're tallish for their volume, and so very good for growing MJ, with lots of space for air-specialized roots.

They can be a little bit tippier than squatter containers, however, so if you're a clumsy mofo, and I'm speaking generally, not addressing you here specifically Go, might be better to go with something more stable ;).

Thanks SS,

Sorry I know I already asked once! Thanks again bro, and great growing, as usual!

Things are shaping up on this end. Awaiting shipments still. :popcorn:

A certain special shop opens on the 1st....:tokin:

-Go
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

Ss question for you... What will be your next endeavor? Hopefully debunking some myth, or trying something new, just something like this last one for us to follow along.


I'm not sure yet, but since I have some plants just starting to bloom, I have some time to think about it.


This is what I've been doing to relax ;)


P10201411.JPG


P10201391.JPG


P10201421.JPG


P1020146.JPG


P1020145.JPG



These are four PPP clones in a 24" window box planter. I like these planters because they don't have a large volume, so are easy to water and maintain, but they dry out much slower than individual small pots. This planter has Roots organic soil with OC+ and Dynamite Mater Magic. The clones were flipped at 5-6" about 2 weeks ago. If these 4 plants yield anywhere near 1/4-1/2 oz each, I'm going to try a 12/12 grow from seed or small clones with three or four of those planters, and 12-16 plants. I'm going to use both soil and passive hydro with these planters, and with 12/12 grows using the same strains, I'll be able to fairly quickly determine what medium gives me the results and quality of final product that I'm looking for.

They're up to about 10-11", and just started popping hairs about 3 days ago. If they don't yield enough, I'll veg them a little longer next time, but fast turnover is the idea here, with this tent continuously running 12/12, and the window box planters being replaced as they are harvested.


Here's what's going on in the HID tent, which I'm running because I had some Sunset Kush clones that were ready to flower, and because the weather has been cold and I need to run the HID tent to keep the garage warm enough.


P1020149.JPG


P1020150.JPG


P1020151.JPG


P10201571.JPG


P10201591.JPG


P10201581.JPG


P1020165.JPG


P1020163.JPG


P1020161.JPG


The last pic is the same plant that I LST'ed a few days ago for the LST pictorial I posted. You can see how almost all of it's stretch energy has gone laterally instead of vertically. This Sunset Kush has pretty much stopped stretching and is at 20".

All the plants in this tent are Sunset Kush clones. The two beasts in the back are my original two flowering clones that I cut from Vicky, a plant that went 3.2 oz on a grow that was not at all dialed-in. These two beasts are bigger than Vicky, have stems about 3/4" thick, and I think they're going to make me very happy ;).

They're in 2-gallon pots with 70/30 coco/perlite, OC+, and I've also been using GH's Maxi-Gro and Maxi-Bloom nutes with excellent results. This coco was prepped by rinsing thoroughly and has given me no trouble at all. The two soil plants in front remind of why I love growing in soil. They have huge leaves, beautiful color, and their growth rate is very fast.

I mixed up my own soil using:

4 parts quality potting soil (used odds and ends for this particular mix)
1 part worm castings
1 part organic compost
1 part coco
1 part pumice
prilled dolomite lime
kelp meal

Retains water well, drains well, and the plants are lovin' it ;).




So, I'm havin' fun with these two grows, and the tents won't be vacant for a few weeks, which gives me time to think about the next comparison or mythbuster grow.

thanks Karr ;)
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

how high are your lights ? as my clones have gotten older I drop the light closer

did you get clones or seeds ? I got 2 seedlings under a T5 4 bulb and I'm waiting to move them under the LED until they get a little bigger

When I first put my plants under the led I had it too close (or I put them under that strong a light too young) and had heat issues with one of the strains I am growing. I have these strains going right now:
magus genetics - motavation
ghs - slh
ghs - arjans strawberry haze
ghs - hawaiian snow
tulare county - trainwreck/blueberry cross
tulare county - nl#5/BlueDream cross

The lights I am using are 84 watts of t5's and a 700 watt led with 15 spectrums and 3watt leds running at 2.65 watts per. I started all plants from seed october 16 went into paper towel, then into 8 oz cups for 2 weeks, then into 1 gal nursery pots, transplanted to 5gal nurs. pots Dec 2.
The manufacturer recommends 32" for veg and 10" for flower, I think I started it at around 28, maybe lower which resulted in damage to the motavation plant (survived, which is why everything is vegging a little longer). The nodes are incredibly close together on all the plants, loving this light now that I've got the temp control worked out. Part of my problem is I spent a lot on the light, wanted to get a little more stuff for my closet (ir resistant reflective foil for the walls and ceiling, light mover to use the 8' of space in the closet, ventilation and carbon filter) ending up using ona breeze and circulating fans, 4mil plastic for floor instead of trays, etc. Oh well, I will upgrade that part as I go, I feel like this light I have is pretty friggin badass (after watching SS, Irishboy, etc.) so I am ahead of the game (again, IMO, doesn't mean much!)

Yo, Phil. I have young moms of S, Haze and H. Snow, among others. Those two are totally opposite in appearance.
Will you flower yours together?? Pictures, journal? Please post a link in your signature.

Yes, I'm flowering them together, along with some that finish in 50-60 days, 70-80 days, 90-100, etc. so I have something a little different every couple weeks - I love variety. I especially have been waiting to smoke hawaiian snow since I first read about it. I really think I can do something with a plant like that. Started my seeds Oct. 16, had a few heat issues at first but squared away now. I will be posting pics after I start flowering, which is the next 10 days or so. I am using a 700 watt led that has 15 light spectrums and 3 watt lights running around 2.65 watts per light. temps at the light fixture are around 101 (right on the fixture) but within an inch drop considerably, max temp in room now is 91, lights off is 75, with lights on at floor level temps are 71, rh stays between 27 and 48. I've got a few pics right now, going to start my journal here after I show flowers, hate veg stage!

One more thing on the LED I'm using: manufacturer claims to get 8000 lumens at 40 feet!
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

Your tent is looking pleasingly full! I want to watch what you do with this planter!

Hope you are having a Happy New Year!!
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

I would have to agree with Irish on his 18 or 24. With your meticulous approach it could shed some light on a frequently opinionated debate.

I understand arguments both ways. No where plants grow(arctic variety aside if any exist) a 24 hour day is possible. The pro 18 ers will argue about the amount of growth that takes place in the dark, the whole stored energy thing. The indisputable advantage they have is 6 hours a day less electricity usage.

Then the 24 guys, they cite that cannabis is C4(or c3?) plant that does not require rest. They talk of dark only showing growth by means of stretch and that they actually do not grow faster with dark(usably). More light equals more bud and shorter fatter plants.

A lot of these guys cite the big growers in netherlands and such, but I'm sure even there not everyone agrees.

It would be fun to compare using two very similar enviormentes and a stable mother.

But do you have two of the same plants? Couldnt really do led in one and hps in the other.
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

I would have to agree with Irish on his 18 or 24. With your meticulous approach it could shed some light on a frequently opinionated debate.

I understand arguments both ways. No where plants grow(arctic variety aside if any exist) a 24 hour day is possible. The pro 18 ers will argue about the amount of growth that takes place in the dark, the whole stored energy thing. The indisputable advantage they have is 6 hours a day less electricity usage.

Then the 24 guys, they cite that cannabis is C4(or c3?) plant that does not require rest. They talk of dark only showing growth by means of stretch and that they actually do not grow faster with dark(usably). More light equals more bud and shorter fatter plants.

A lot of these guys cite the big growers in netherlands and such, but I'm sure even there not everyone agrees.

It would be fun to compare using two very similar enviormentes and a stable mother.

But do you have two of the same plants? Couldnt really do led in one and hps in the other.

Happy New Year, SS!

Irish and Karr both bring up points I have thought much about, but have never tested side-by-side so to speak.

The second half of the lighting debate! Yay, LEDs work fine. (No surprise there, at least for me)

Now its on to lighting schedules, no matter which source lighting you end up picking. I would also love for you to test and either prove or debunk some of the more obvious questions when it comes to lighting schedules.

Not anywhere in the world is there a complete day (24hrs) of light. Nor does anywhere in the world have 12hrs dark with 12hrs light, or an absolute even split from complete sun to complete darkness. The sun does not come on and go off like a light switch(surprise!). Outdoor plants even get artificial lighting from pesky neighborhood lighting(I live in the city, lights everywhere.) Street lights, bug zappers, MH and HPS security lighting and of course MOON LIGHTING. Multiple foreign light sources, yet you'll hear time and time again from indoor growers, DO NOT LET ANY LIGHT 'LEAK' INTO YOUR TENT(not even a light on your power strips, P.S. mine has tape over it!)! I can attest to very good yields with all this excess 'bad' lighting outdoors... So something isn't right here.

SS to the rescue?! :yahoo:

I've grown outdoors in the past with much success without having to worry about lighting schedules and the like. I also have worked outside during opposite times of year, winter vs. summer. The lighting is not 12/12 during the flowering months. I know of waking up at 5am to go to work at 6am and coming home at 8pm when its still light outside. Now that is fact and can not be disputed by any growers. The sun is up and the plant is receiving light from 6am to 8pm, and it didn't get, what we would call "dark" until 8:45pm. Regardless of light intensity in the early and late hours of the longest days. It's still light and these are the months I noticed a HUGE jump in weight. That is 14 hours of "light" per day. Still, the sunlight is only at its most intense for maybe 8 hours of the day, where indoors it would be the entire "day" cycle, current indoor growers swear you MUST use 12/12 to flower and any more or less will confuse the plants. Also, they will argue you MUST NOT let any light leak into your grow tent(please DEBUNK this one!!!). Where in the world do you get darkness where you can't even see your own hand in front of your face, much like inside our tents, anyone?

The "moon light"(quarter, half or full moon) gives off the same spectrum of light as the sun(obviously), the sun is the original source of light reflecting off the moon. So, ACTINIC LIGHTING occurs for at least 8 hours each night, which is HIGHLY blue in spectrum, even though the entire spectrum is present. I think the night schedules need as much study as the study time we put into the type or duration of light we use. I've used actinic lighting in combination with MH's(14k temp/very blue) on my reef tanks for years. And without actinics on your reef you'll lose a lot of coral growth(propagation occurs mainly at night(shouts to PropaGator!)) Your corals and fish will also lose "color" intensity without actinics, even with the super bright blue 14k MH bulbs. It doesn't take much actinic lighting to see a HUGE difference in your entire tank. I have 300watts of 14k MH with 36watts CFL of Actinics. So, a little actinic lighting goes a long way.

Maybe, adding some actinic bulbs in one of the tents during the "night" hours would be a starting point of testing to see if any light is indeed bad for indoor growing during the "night cycles" and if actinics add anything special(who knows, there's clearly something different outdoors, besides free radicals!). If you compared outdoor lighting during the day vs night, or sun vs moon. The intensity change might "feel" like complete darkness to the plant, but there is still a full spectrum, although at a much lower intensity during the night, being provided to the plant for the entire 24 hour period. (Side thought: An LED array or electronic ballast for MH/HPS, that could do 100% intensity during the "day" and step down to 5-10% intensity to replicate "night" hours?)

With each year passing, growers 'round the world are finding NEW and exciting ways of doing things. Anything is possible, we have much to learn. Let's keep open minds as we are sure to debunk something along the way, it's part of the love of this hobby, I'd say!

Any thoughts? :lot-o-toke:
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

One question I have in regards to night activity. If they plants use more CO2 during the daylight cycle does that mean they use oxygen at night ? I swear mine smell less during the "dark" cycle of 18/6
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

Nine Leafer, I know you're right on with the "must be total dark" crap. 'They' will continue to rave on about little light leaks ad nauseum no matter who says otherwise, so let them.
The part about 12 strict hours religion is very interesting. And actinic light? We need half-dozen more Setting Suns, because the only one I know is busy. Harvested a 5 month show grow, and right away stuffs his tent with lush homebrew.
Sunset Kush :yummy:

What you, me, SS and a bunch of others need is the results of many controlled enviroment grows, wherein only one variable at a time is changed. As SS says, such trials are not production runs, and are best done with serious computer controlled and recorded operations. Until a company with no vested interest does this comprehensively and publishes results, we will lose steps even as we gain ground.

Dexter, plants don't just use less CO2 at night: they use none. They don't use much O2 either, but like having it around. Photosynthesis is the only source of O2 this planet Earth has. Every gram of iron ore for instance, was iron exposed to biologically sourced O2. Terra-forming this planet took a while.
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

18/6 vs 24/0 veg
LST vs none LST
soil vs hydro

i really want to see the 18/6 vs 24/0 though
oh maybe lollipop vs none lolipoping.

a few ideas to sit on.lol

tents are looking good. :thumb:


There are a few burning a hole in my pocket, and I'd like to help kill at least two with one stone, so I'm thinking of combining vertical CMH versus vertical HPS, with six plants in each tent, and also address soil versus hydro, with 3 soil and 3 hempy plants in each tent.


the MG soil comparo is the one I've wanted to do the longest, but the vertical 250w CMH vs 250w HPS, combined with soil vs hydro, actually kills 3 birds with one stone, because I'll also see what kind of yield I get with a vertical 250w HID bulb versus the 360w LED and 400w HID horizontal results
on this grow.

That's the idea du jour, anyways ;)
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

There are a few burning a hole in my pocket, and I'd like to help kill at least two with one stone, so I'm thinking of combining vertical CMH versus vertical HPS, with six plants in each tent, and also address soil versus hydro, with 3 soil and 3 hempy plants in each tent.
:rocker:

the MG soil comparo is the one I've wanted to do the longest, but the vertical 250w CMH vs 250w HPS, combined with soil vs hydro, actually kills 3 birds with one stone, because I'll also see what kind of yield I get with a vertical 250w HID bulb versus the 360w LED and 400w HID horizontal results on this grow.

That's the idea du jour, anyways ;)
You may tackle the "MG soil is horrible" myth? I expect it to do fine under your tutelage.
I'm going to shop for a big bag of :popcorn:
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

I will be using MG organics choice, as well as Happy Frog soil, so I can see which does better. Both are on the list that my seed bank recommend soils for use without having to feed if correct pot size is chosen.

-Go
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

Nine Leafer, I know you're right on with the "must be total dark" crap. 'They' will continue to rave on about little light leaks ad nauseum no matter who says otherwise, so let them.
The part about 12 strict hours religion is very interesting. And actinic light? We need half-dozen more Setting Suns, because the only one I know is busy. Harvested a 5 month show grow, and right away stuffs his tent with lush homebrew.
Sunset Kush :yummy:

What you, me, SS and a bunch of others need is the results of many controlled enviroment grows, wherein only one variable at a time is changed. As SS says, such trials are not production runs, and are best done with serious computer controlled and recorded operations. Until a company with no vested interest does this comprehensively and publishes results, we will lose steps even as we gain ground.


I completely agree. These kinds of comparisons are best done in university grow labs, or by a private labs or true "Consumer Reports" type private organizations that are independently funded.

The farther apart the technologies are being compared, the harder it is to do correctly outside of the above settings.

Testing and comparing similar gear, such as two different LED lights, CMH vs HID, soil comparisons, etc., lend themselves more to a garage setting, and until cannabis is legalized and these professional testing services are available, I indulge my curiosity and enjoy doing the best I can ;).

I won't take on an experiment or comparison that I don't think has decent chance of being successful, because I can't afford to do that, but it's not about absolute yield for me, because an efficient micro-grow is sexier to me than a warehouse full of giant colas, although, of course, I wouldn't exactly toss the latter out of bed ;).
 
re: GrowLEDHydro 300W LED vs. 400W HID Demonstration

I completely agree. These kinds of comparisons are best done in university grow labs, or by a private labs or true "Consumer Reports" type private organizations that are independently funded.

The farther apart the technologies are being compared, the harder it is to do correctly outside of the above settings.

As most of me agrees with you, part of me lends itself to thought. Where would the world be if we relied solely on Universities to test or invent new ways to old ideas.
:smokin2:

Testing and comparing similar gear, such as two different LED lights, CMH vs HID, soil comparisons, etc., lend themselves more to a garage setting, and until cannabis is legalized and these professional testing services are available, I indulge my curiosity and enjoy doing the best I can ;).

...And your best is always a job well done, which is why I find myself here, now, writing this. :thankyou:

Pitting these types of tests against each other is more a test of, in my opinion, spectrum availability in each light source. Maybe, instead of testing R/B/Y/O/Uv/Ir LEDs against the same, maybe pit them against white/warm 2000k-3000k to 6000-7000k temp LEDS.

CMH vs HID, or actually CMH vs MH, again just spectrum availability.

Soil comparisons are about availability of nutes, or testing which nute packed soil is best suited for indoor use.

Years ago when I grew outdoors, it was a very 3rd grader approach. Plants need water, dirt and light. Mostly free items. I dug a big hole filled it with some lava rock from the front yard(that ugly ground cover, 1-2inch chunks) and cheap soil from a local nursery. I would drag the water hose over to it every other day, turn on the water on low and let it soak for about an hour. Nothing special. The product was amazing. 6 ft plant with tons of dense colas and incredible frost. Back then I didn't know a thing about pH'ing water. I didn't add nutes. I didn't let the water sit over night to get rid of chloramines. Didn't check water temperature prior to watering. I didn't chop the bottom layers off(lollipop). I didn't do a thing, I didn't know any better. Now, I've got a cabinet(and I love them all) full of vitamins and minerals for my girls, along with pH Up and Down, Perlite, Kelp additives, Endos and Ectos. So, by saying this I don't mean to say it couldn't have been improved on, but an apple can only get so sweet. The focus was not on nutes or spectrum(when I grew outdoors) but lets assume you have the Sun's spectrum matched(CMH) as closely as you are going to get for indoors. What are the other variables, of the many, when thinking about outdoor vs indoor? Could it be Co2 availability? Natural stress of the outdoors? Lighting schedules(duration)? Night lights? Which of these variables are worth testing and which of these can be tested with what we have available to us, your average garage dwelling growers?

I think I'm trying to push you to test things that aren't yet known. (Little greedy on my part... hehe)

The tests you've mentioned are more or less tests to see, of the things we KNOW work, which will give you the best(best may mean quantity or quality to you) end results. And I can appreciate that.

I won't take on an experiment or comparison that I don't think has decent chance of being successful, because I can't afford to do that, but it's not about absolute yield for me, because an efficient micro-grow is sexier to me than a warehouse full of giant colas, although, of course, I wouldn't exactly toss the latter out of bed ;).

100% agreed. Although, finding out if some thing, in particular, is better suited for the plants natural cycle vs what is currently understood, then that, my friend, is invaluable.

It's a pleasure reading your threads. I've learned a lot from this thread alone as I had little, to no, knowledge of indoor growing prior to finding this. The money you saved me, from buying things that don't work, is amazing. I know I'll learn from whatever you decide to take on, and I will be aboard! Thanks! Oh and stop by my thread when you have some time, check out what you've inspired directly through this thread.

:thumb:
 
Back
Top Bottom