Hey Woodsman,
I just smoked a bowl of my NL and I think I'm going to zone out on your journal.
We are growing the same strain, NL#5, purchased from the same seed bank and at about the same time and I think after our grows we will be able to answer a lot of questions on our minds and I look forward to the results. Budget vs. non budget? Seeds vs. clones? Do I really need more lighting? 600wt vs 100wt and CFL's? Fish emulsion and molasses vs. FF trio, bud candy and olivia's for the youngsters? LST vs. top vs. natural? Does more money equal bigger harvests? I have this gut feeling that I might be throwing money away if your NL harvest per plant equals or exceeds your mazar grow and I hope it does.
I agree very much with what you are saying about the lighting but is it possible to really have enough light other than natural. When I bought my light I did some research and found people saying that a 600wt, 95,000 lumens, light was enough to get a really good grow and I do get good grows but I also find the light does not penetrate the canopy like I thought it was going to and now I think I need more lighting for the undergrowth so I'm checking into three 2' T5, 10,000 lumens each, lights to mount on the sides of the grow room, that would be a total of 125k lumens but would the added harvest equal or exceed the cost of the lighting?
I've never tried LSTing because I never thought I was going to have to worry about plant height but my Crystal has proven me wrong as it has grown taller than my 78" tent will allow and a single 600wt just won't reach the lower canopy so with your great advice I have tied her down and this is allowing more light to reach more area. On each of the three grows I've done I've had topped plants and not topped plants. The non topped plants are more beautiful to look at because you have that big beautiful main cola but I think that is about all you get, well on indicas you get the huge water leaves that you have to cut off or tuck under and I don't think doing either helps out that much with the lighting. The topped plants seem to have smaller leaf size with more of the under growth shooting to the light and my harvests have been about 20% more. I've started some clones early for the next grow and I'm going to try double topping some and see what happens and if I ever get the nerve I will try LSTing.
Great comments Dreamin,
I am so happy to hear that the NL#5 that we both have 'works' and gets you 'zoned out'! As you know my Mazar is only 'good' and I did not achieve the desired outcome that I had so much wanted. Hopefully that was the results of either bad genetics or just expired 'shelf life' leftover seeds that were just being given out to get rid of them rather than anything done on my end. Like bad or insufficient lighting, bad or wrong kind soil (mostly peat), pH being off (I had no meter to check). With these seeds, which are the ones I ordered, I will value greatly your grow and smoke reports!
I would think that you can have enough 'artificial' lighting. even with 400w hid just need the correct conditions. the addition of the side lighting your thinking of (T5's) sounds worth it.. If you were going to grow without any manipulation, that should work. Without additional lighting on tall plants it's possible to trim off the lower growth thus having only the top portion illuminated like SOG . Kind of like a pine forest with very little lower growth. If I had the room (height) and was not wanting to be very 'active' with the grow, that would be a good solution. Rather than the almost daily work involved with any manual manipulations or 'MM' (at least in the beginning). I've always wondered if potency is related to any of this. For instance all the energy used in producing the extra stems, leaves, buds (even though they are individually smaller) of LST, cropping etc... Compared to natural growth with fewer but larger colas. I wonder if potency drops with the added effort the plant must exert with 'MM'
On the other hand your right about smaller leaf size with MM and perhaps that evens out the energy expenditure somewhat? Although if you are sure that your producing possibly 20% more with MM then there is added effort on the part of the plant! Deep! My head is starting to hurt from my thought efforts!
Double toppings you mentioned will definitely slow down (delay, as in time) the grow. But grow you a bush! If my theory above, questioning the possible shortcomings of MM has validity, then I would use MM only if necessary. For indoor crops, space and lighting. For outdoor crops, stealth as in keeping the plants short (as in my case) yet as wide as possible. If you do crop or use FIM do it early (3rd or fourth node) and them if you do in again, after two nodes (my way). If you do it later, it's a total waste of everything that is underneath. That part becomes irrelevant later in growth.
As I describe in my previous post above concerning my plan, I will try to bend the plant over later in it's veg state. Imagine a 90 deg bend about three,four or five inches above the ground with maybe ten inches of horizontal stem with growth at all the nodes from the bend to the original top all growing up to the light. I'm encouraging this growth now by alternating my LST from day to day. Vertical growth one day and undergrowth the next until I've reached the desired size or height.
I'm rambling too much and am afraid that I'm repeating myself trying to respond to your great comments above.