Dankman_420
Well-Known Member
I remember reading years ago about CMH were originally made for additional lighting for greenhouses, which needed the extra heat. I have a friend who used to use one. He said it performed same as 600 hps
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Skybound I believe they call it a full spectrum light. I keep reading that a 315w CMH will compete with a 600w HPS. I also keep reading that a 600w HPS yields better. So- whatever that means....Is CMH dual spectrum?
Is that like a twig stove ? I’ll look it up.rocket stove
Thanks GT! I hate hijacking a thread.... sorry Wease. PAR is a sum of all useable light energy within the spectrum. Surely the area of the spectrum or wavelength distribution matters as much as the total PAR? I guess my question is... optimum spectrum plays a more significant role than total PAR? I guess I’ve never heard a big argument between quality vs quantity of light. Just because it’s “useable” does the plant want it?
I still have 2 Timber setups 4x50w each Cree that I’ve never used for a cycle. My young ones didn’t really care for them and i kept pulling them for my xml.
Thanks a lot guys.
Spitz if it wasn’t for people jacking this thread it would have gone silent the last two winters- so please do.
Most of the info I’ve read on CMH is very conflicting. Not sure why I’m not worried about an efficiency loss if it’s producing some heat as a by product. If I was to convert to super efficient lights I would have to put an electric heater in the grow -which would obviously be stupid.
Skybound I believe they call it a full spectrum light. I keep reading that a 315w CMH will compete with a 600w HPS. I also keep reading that a 600w HPS yields better. So- whatever that means....
Is that like a twig stove ? I’ll look it up.
There was this fellow over by Dease lake (tiny northern BC town in the middle of nowhere) who was making these little twig burners and marketing them on the net when the net barely existed. My friend had one. We used to make coffee on it in the bush. A few little branches in there and it would really roar.
I feel like I handle my buds the bare minimum to trim them- but yer right I don’t see a lot of sticky fingers around the forum so maybe I’m doing it wrong.
Thanks GT! I hate hijacking a thread.... sorry Wease. PAR is a sum of all useable light energy within the spectrum. Surely the area of the spectrum or wavelength distribution matters as much as the total PAR? I guess my question is... optimum spectrum plays a more significant role than total PAR? I guess I’ve never heard a big argument between quality vs quantity of light. Just because it’s “useable” does the plant want it?