- Thread starter
- #1,261
Ok don't count me as an expert on this, but this is how I figure grams per watt.
I divide the dry harvest weight, in grams, by whatever wattage my lights draw. Use the true wattage draw from the wall- none of that 'equivalent to' nonsense.
So let say you harvest 167 grams from your whole flowering area, and your flowering lights draw 207 watts from the wall.
167 divided by 207 = about 0.8 grams per watt. I would call that very good, and about as good a yield as I normally ever get actually.
I think (?) about .5 grams per watt is considered decent for a grower just starting out or a grow where you had some problems and things didn't go great but you still pulled it off. 1 gram per watt is kind of the upper limit/gold standard. If I was harvesting my whole flowering room at one time, and getting 1 g per watt that would mean I would be getting 1.2 kg from the two 600w lights.
There are always people to come along and claim they got 2 g per watt and stuff like that, but....who knows. It's the internet. Nobody can prove it.
This measurement process works best when you have the type of grow where you harvest the whole flowering area at one time, instead of a staggered perpetual harvest. However, since one screen takes up exactly 1/4 of the scrog space under one of my lights- I can still figure it out.
If you are harvesting only part of your flowering area, you can still calculate the grams/watt, as long as you can measure precisely what percentage of the total area that harvested part took up.
In reality it is an incomplete measurement, because it doesn't take into account some things. Most importantly the number of days it took to grow that harvest. So -one strain might take four months of flowering and another one might take two months.
Grams per watt divided by flowering days would be a better way to measure, but I haven't seen anyone doing that -so there's no public data for me to compare that figure against.
It also doesn't take into account a couple other little details like secondary power draws. Like if you are running HID lights you are usually going to need more ventilation, which uses more power, etc.
In the end it's most useful just to give you something to reference against for your own purposes- to see how much one strain is yielding compared to another strain, or how one flowering round compares to another one. In that case it would definitely make the most sense to factor in the number of flowering days as well.
I don't think I've ever grown a strain that was labelled as high yielding. Most sativas are considered fairly low yield.
Yield isn't something that concerns me a lot, but it's nice to have something to compare to and see how efficiently the grow is working out.
I divide the dry harvest weight, in grams, by whatever wattage my lights draw. Use the true wattage draw from the wall- none of that 'equivalent to' nonsense.
So let say you harvest 167 grams from your whole flowering area, and your flowering lights draw 207 watts from the wall.
167 divided by 207 = about 0.8 grams per watt. I would call that very good, and about as good a yield as I normally ever get actually.
I think (?) about .5 grams per watt is considered decent for a grower just starting out or a grow where you had some problems and things didn't go great but you still pulled it off. 1 gram per watt is kind of the upper limit/gold standard. If I was harvesting my whole flowering room at one time, and getting 1 g per watt that would mean I would be getting 1.2 kg from the two 600w lights.
There are always people to come along and claim they got 2 g per watt and stuff like that, but....who knows. It's the internet. Nobody can prove it.
This measurement process works best when you have the type of grow where you harvest the whole flowering area at one time, instead of a staggered perpetual harvest. However, since one screen takes up exactly 1/4 of the scrog space under one of my lights- I can still figure it out.
If you are harvesting only part of your flowering area, you can still calculate the grams/watt, as long as you can measure precisely what percentage of the total area that harvested part took up.
In reality it is an incomplete measurement, because it doesn't take into account some things. Most importantly the number of days it took to grow that harvest. So -one strain might take four months of flowering and another one might take two months.
Grams per watt divided by flowering days would be a better way to measure, but I haven't seen anyone doing that -so there's no public data for me to compare that figure against.
It also doesn't take into account a couple other little details like secondary power draws. Like if you are running HID lights you are usually going to need more ventilation, which uses more power, etc.
In the end it's most useful just to give you something to reference against for your own purposes- to see how much one strain is yielding compared to another strain, or how one flowering round compares to another one. In that case it would definitely make the most sense to factor in the number of flowering days as well.
I don't think I've ever grown a strain that was labelled as high yielding. Most sativas are considered fairly low yield.
Yield isn't something that concerns me a lot, but it's nice to have something to compare to and see how efficiently the grow is working out.