CRAP, I meant to add:
Thanks for posting the DIY article for everyone!
I assume you ended up with a more useful, efficient, and modern light (and with the same power consumption?). Did it drastically change your panel's
footprint, though, either increase or decrease it (or just change its shape, which is also something to be aware of)?
I've got a 160-watt "dots" LED panel. It was given to me with the (repeated) assurance/insistence that it was "fully capable" of growing and flowering nine square feet. It's sufficient, more or less, if one is growing autos and, thus, running it 18 hours per day throughout the flowering cycle... fox six, if you're not
too worried about density. It's alright when hung at a proper height over a space that it can illuminate, but that's not nine square feet. If growing photoperiodic strains, I doubt it'd be six. Four would probably be pretty good. But, me, "T Trust Your Fellow Man S," I set it up in a 3'x3' space, lol. I've thought about trying to upgrade it, somehow.
But my buddy is finally ready to do a full grow indoors (he's only started his outdoor plants inside previously). I'm giving him some autos (you might know the breeder, RM
) , so I'm thinking now about giving it to him and telling him to make a 3'x2' space, or maybe a 4'x2' since I think he'll end up with three T5 sticks before too long. Or something that they'll fit in but that'll also accommodate the panel's footprint, IDK. He likes to get high and is in pain a lot, so I'd like to see him make it to harvest without getting disappointed. He said, "I'll hang a sheet for walls," and I told him to go to a department store and ask if they have any refrigerator boxes and grab a can of flat white spray paint on the way out the door. It's
that kind of low-budget grow (he's depending on ME for equipment, lmao, so that's to be expected).
Wait... Forgot the thread topic. Better click on the button now.