Looking good Gazoo, how much longer you think?
So you know when you mentioned that afterntku spray Brix the temp goes up for a while? I just noticed this, thanks to your observations. I sprayed my destroyer with Brix+Snake oil, and the CD-1 and DDA both got Brix, and now this morning my tent is running 80f where it usually runs 77-78. That’s very interesting, and reminds me of my own body.
You spray them with a foliar and it seems to get warmer, is this a boost to the plants metabolism? Cause after I eat, I burn that food up like crazy. I’m a human heater, can feel the heat radiating off me about 20-30 min after I eat.
Very cool stuff.
Thanks, the breeder estimate is 11 - 13 weeks. Been told, and noticed the kit will extend the growing time some
BUT the inclusion of the Far-Red I think has negated that. Checked with loop last night and could only find a very
few amber so expecting, HOPING for a 13 weeks or better. She is just starting to get CHUBBY
Oh I only noticed the HEAT increase at the ROOT BALL TEMP and never made note of the tent temps, good
call I will start to watch for that as well
Thanks, always looking for cool ways to make things work the way I want
I will give them a look. Seems I
really need to run a strain more than once to really take advantage of the controller benefits, I am now
trying to dial in the EQUILATERAL Sativas
What is the temperature of equatorial region?
Wet equatorial climate, major climate type of the Köppen classification characterized by consistently high temperatures (around 30 °C [86 °F]), with plentiful precipitation (150–1,000 cm [59–394 inches]), heavy cloud cover, and high humidity, with very little annual temperature variation.
Average annual temperatures in equatorial lowlands are around 31 °C (88 °F) during the afternoon and 23 °C (73 °F) around sunrise.
================================================
Also wanted to mention I found more info on
GREEN LIGHT & STOMATA CLOSE
Abstract
Green light reversal of blue light-stimulated stomatal opening was discovered in isolated stomata. The present study shows that the response also occurs in stomata from intact leaves.
Arabidopsis thaliana plants were grown in a growth chamber under blue, red and green light.
Removal of the green light opened the stomata and restoration of green light closed them to baseline values under experimental conditions that rule out a mesophyll-mediated effect. Assessment of the response to green light over a daily time course showed that the stomatal sensitivity to green light was observed only in the morning, which coincided with the use of potassium as a guard cell osmoticum. Sensitivity to green light was absent during the afternoon phase of stomatal movement, which was previously shown to be dominated by sucrose osmoregulation in
Vicia faba. Hence, the shift away from potassium-based osmoregulation in guard cells is further postulated to entail a shift from blue light to photosynthesis as the primary component of the stomatal response to light. Stomata from intact leaves of the zeaxanthin-less,
npq1 mutant of Arabidopsis failed to respond to the removal or restoration of green light in the growth chamber, or to short, high fluence pulses of blue or green light. These data confirm previous studies showing that
npq1 stomata are devoid of a specific blue light response. In contrast, stomata from intact leaves of
phot1 phot2 double mutant plants had a reduced but readily detectable response to the removal of green light and to blue and green pulses.
MORE from this STUDY suggest its more PRONOUNCED at SUN-RISE
On the other hand, there was a large difference in the stomatal
sensitivity to green light at different times of the daily cycle. The experiments described above (Fig. 2a) were performed 3 h after the start of the light-on part of the cycle in the growth chamber, physiologically analogous to the morning hours of solar radiation.
Green light removal experiments conducted 7 h after the start of illumination, equivalent to the afternoon in a natural daily cycle, showed no green light sensitivity under any fluence rate tested (Fig. 2b) even though initial morning and afternoon apertures were of comparable magnitude. These results indicate that the blue light-specific photoreceptor system is a component of the light response of stomata in the morning and not in the afternoon.
Fig. 1 Removal of green light opens stomata from intact leaves of wild-type Arabidopsis. Plants were grown in a growth chamber under red (60 µmol m–2 s–1), blue (30 µmol m–2 s–1) and green (30 µmol m–2 s–1) fluorescent light. (a) Effect on stomatal aperture of the removal and restoration of the green component of illumination (R, G and B light). The time of the removal of green light is shown by the bar at the bottom of the graph. Also shown are results from experiments carried out in the absence of blue light (R and G light), showing no response to green removal. In this experiment, initial illumination was composed of 90 µmol m–2 s–1 red and 30 µmol m–2 s–1 green light. (b) Experiments showing that changes in red far-red illumination under background blue light do not elicit changes in stomatal apertures, ruling out a phytochrome effect on the response. Red and far-red light were given at 60 µmol m–2 s–1 and blue light at 30 µmol m–2 s–1. Points represent the average of three experiments with 30–50 stomatal aperture measurements per experiment ±SE of the measurement.
Fig. 2 Removal of green light opens stomata from intact leaves of wild-type Arabidopsis in the morning and not in the afternoon. Experimental conditions are as in the experiment shown in Fig. 1a. The total fluence rate in the chamber was adjusted to the specified value 1 h before the start of the experiment by varying the distance to the light sources. Results are shown for experiments started 3 h (a) and 7 h (b) into the 12 h daily light cycle of the growth chamber. Points represent the average of three experiments with 30–50 stomatal aperture measurements per experiment.