New Moon Over Guawi: A High Brix Journey

Not so sure I light this conclusion, though....

"Significantly higher calcium, magnesium and sodium
contents were recorded in magnetic
untreated water under all salinity levels compared
to one time magnetic treated water
. The
reduction in calcium, magnesium and sodium contents
was more conspicuous at the lower
level of salinity and with one time magnetized water"

Must keep reading....

Does this mean if done twice its lower?
Also thats for the untreated water so not sure

BTW The second study above was done with mung beans
 
Not so sure I light this conclusion, though....

"Significantly higher calcium, magnesium and sodium
contents were recorded in magnetic
untreated water under all salinity levels compared
to one time magnetic treated water. The
reduction in calcium, magnesium and sodium contents
was more conspicuous at the lower
level of salinity and with one time magnetized water"

Must keep reading....

Oh something just occurred to me, are the HIGHER levels DUE to
the better release and thats why the levels are higher in the run off ?
Is that were they measure the levels ?

EDIT CRAP every time I read it I interpet it differently ?
Does it say the levels are HIGHER in "MAGNETICALLY UNTREATED" water ?
or in other words NOT MAGNETICALLY TREATED

OR

"Untreated water" that HAS been Magnetically treated ?
 
They used Magnets wrapped around the water line with the magnets configured in
this way,

mag.png


BUT here is another style that is easy to make and according to another study that used these the best configuration
was 4 magnets used in a NNSS position ( N to N & S to S)

Link
ANOTHER STUDY


The tests were done using 6 various magnet orientations with Magnetized filtered city tap water.

Note:
"to magnetize the water, we used AQUATOMIC water treatment devices with the magnets arranged in varying North/South configurations."
So if you were to test the theory would the water need to be in constant motion to effectively treat the water? I can see some validity of using magnets to change the +/- charge of the water.
 
So if you were to test the theory would the water need to be in constant motion to effectively treat the water? I can see some validity of using magnets to change the +/- charge of the water.

Good Question. My understanding is there are 2 ways but both need movement
1) a Vortex will structure water
2) Magnetic field can structure water

Once the water is passed through the structuring process i think it reverts back (memory) over time. ?
 
Very interesting read. I will be watching.
 
DAY 41 VEG

roots_gdp_1.jpg


=====================
=====================

up_pot_gdp_5.jpg


=====================
=====================


both_top_1.jpg


=====================
=====================


both_top_front_1.jpg


=====================
=====================


gdp_top_2.jpg


=====================
=====================


guawi_top_1.jpg


=====================
=====================


moisture_1.jpg


=====================
=====================


pot_2.jpg


=====================
=====================


structure_4.jpg


=====================
=====================


 
Interesting Observations:

1) I was going to start the TIME CHANGE to flower today but will need to Postpone Due to
the GUAWI still doing the PAIRED NODES. GDP is doing alternating signalling she is mature enough
to FLOWER but she will have to wait for the GUAWI to come on board first.

Oh SIDE NOTE, while doing my research I found an interesting observation make by ?
The statement was when running SATIVAs reducing the day light by 1hr in week 4 or 5
will single them to FINISH up FASTER. Will try this and maybe I can get the GUAWI finished
in a shorter run time ?

2) I installed my ROOT BALL corded temp monitors, Problem is they are NEW and I did not
do a accurate check on the readings :confused: i do remember they were reading very close to
the same when out of the pots.

Problem IS the GDP has been going up daily and has reached
a CRITICAL POINT at 31.1 C or 87.98 deg F
The GUAWI is rising but only at 22.2 C or 71.96 deg F

I may have some 2nd run COOKING still going on in the pot that may have been activated
when watered and tiled (up-pot) I dont see any issues with her but getting a bit concerned
 
Seems I have been talking to myself for about a week here :)
Not seeing a lot of interest, and only a few visitors.

No need to include all the info. I will only be posting pictures.
If anyone sees something they are interested in hearing about
you will need to ask
 
Do your updates for yourself brother! Sure we appreciate whatever you post but its your journal to run how you want. Throw any and all detail you want in there if that info helps you man. Visitors are down everywhere I think. Those of us that are interested will hang around.
 
Do your updates for yourself brother! Sure we appreciate whatever you post but its your journal to run how you want. Throw any and all detail you want in there if that info helps you man. Visitors are down everywhere I think. Those of us that are interested will hang around.
I really friggin wish they would bring back the mobile app. I'm sure it's my internet, but when someone does a photo dump takes ages to load and my browser isn't always responsive to the site.
 
See I never used the phone app. I always used my laptop. Now I use the desktop site on my phone and its pretty easy. I know a lot of people used the app. I do my best to not have my cell phone in my hand lol.
 
LOL my eyes are too bad close up to use the phone unless I wear cheaters and I hate them! I can use the lap top and not have to wear glasses. If I could see the phone, I might use it more LOL. My arms aren't long enough to use the phone much.
 
LOL my eyes are too bad close up to use the phone unless I wear cheaters and I hate them! I can use the lap top and not have to wear glasses. If I could see the phone, I might use it more LOL. My arms aren't long enough to use the phone much.
I know you've said your tall, so how you gonna have Trex arms....:rofl:
 
No TRex arms LOL....just terrible eyes for reading. I am 20-10 vision away from me...lol...just can't read my phone. If I could get it just a little further away or make everything a little bigger i would be ok. Or I suppose I could just use the freaking cheaters.
 
I'm fortunate enough to have perfect vision not sure what is better than 20/20 but I have that! Only problem I have is floaties which is common.

Hopefully your going to the eye Dr for check ups. Mother in law went recently and just by checking her eyes they could tell she has a vitamin deficiency and bad migranes, now she has to get a mri to see what's going on. I didn't know they could tell that from your eyes.
 
20-10 is better than 20-20, I can see great outdoors , which is more important to me. I love being able to spot just about anything when I am out in the woods.

I haven't been to an eye doctor in a long time, probably should check in here sometime soon.
 
Back
Top Bottom