- Thread starter
- #20,321
Mars Hydro
420 Sponsor
oh... ganjazz, sweet sugar... so frosty
Bud -Trichome pics mars2 700w
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bud -Trichome pics mars2 700w
hello Stoney, MarsII1200w will be a good choice for 4'x4' grow area.
hi flyboy, sorry about this, could you tell me more about it? After you plug it and resend the program, will the light work properly? Then the light will not work with the program again, you need to unplug it again and resend it. Hope we can work it out together. More details are apprecaited very much.
I came here to ask this question as well - which Mars Hydro is the best light for flowering a 4x4 coverage area?
Website says the 1200w is Maximum Coverage: Covers a full 4' x 4' easily replace a 600W HPS or HID.
I know from experience the 550 watt Mars1200 does easily replace a 600w HPS, but don't people recommend using 1000w HPS for flowering a 4x4? And 600w for 3x3?
Going by that logic, I need 1 size bigger than recommended, except the 1600 only draws 730 watts, so I don't think it could truly compete with a 1000w HPS and still wouldn't be quite enough for a 4x4.
I'm sure the 1200 could flower a 4x4 fine but the extra power really adds to the quality and yield I think. So does anyone have a 4x4 overpowered recommendation?
I don't know enough about the new PRO series to understand how they scale watt for watt with a top quality hps grow. The highest watt CREE option is only 670w draw, which still doesn't sound like enough power, or is it really that much more efficient than 1000w?
the leaves look happy. maybe it's time for a bigger pot.
I came here to ask this question as well - which Mars Hydro is the best light for flowering a 4x4 coverage area?
Website says the 1200w is Maximum Coverage: Covers a full 4' x 4' easily replace a 600W HPS or HID.
I know from experience the 550 watt Mars1200 does easily replace a 600w HPS, but don't people recommend using 1000w HPS for flowering a 4x4? And 600w for 3x3?
Going by that logic, I need 1 size bigger than recommended, except the 1600 only draws 730 watts, so I don't think it could truly compete with a 1000w HPS and still wouldn't be quite enough for a 4x4.
I'm sure the 1200 could flower a 4x4 fine but the extra power really adds to the quality and yield I think. So does anyone have a 4x4 overpowered recommendation?
I don't know enough about the new PRO series to understand how they scale watt for watt with a top quality hps grow. The highest watt CREE option is only 670w draw, which still doesn't sound like enough power, or is it really that much more efficient than 1000w?
yeah them teas work But yer smokin' that what you apply is a general rulz thingy
the lady birds are just a bother when they migrate , i'd have spot infections of mites & they'd clear in days
the lady birds will eat any bug around
Oh yeah I had rot issues tryin to keep the pred mites happy it was a lose/lose grow even bubble hash was lousy
WOW, Klovneposen! I am speechless... My gratefulness for your post is beyond words. This is very instructive and helpful. I will make use of it sometime in the future.
I came here to ask this question as well - which Mars Hydro is the best light for flowering a 4x4 coverage area?
Website says the 1200w is Maximum Coverage: Covers a full 4' x 4' easily replace a 600W HPS or HID.
I know from experience the 550 watt Mars1200 does easily replace a 600w HPS, but don't people recommend using 1000w HPS for flowering a 4x4? And 600w for 3x3?
Going by that logic, I need 1 size bigger than recommended, except the 1600 only draws 730 watts, so I don't think it could truly compete with a 1000w HPS and still wouldn't be quite enough for a 4x4.
I'm sure the 1200 could flower a 4x4 fine but the extra power really adds to the quality and yield I think. So does anyone have a 4x4 overpowered recommendation?
I don't know enough about the new PRO series to understand how they scale watt for watt with a top quality hps grow. The highest watt CREE option is only 670w draw, which still doesn't sound like enough power, or is it really that much more efficient than 1000w?
Tina got right on it , going to send out a new receiver with the new light I ordered, I'll install , should fix the problem ,it's always hard with new tech , it's all good
They really are that efficient ,I'm using 2 X 320 pro series over a 5x10 , would really recommend the Mars II 1600w for a 4x4 and true 1000w replacement, or 2 X 1200w over a 4x4 , I had 4 of those and a pro 320 in a 5x10 at one time 3000w. Now it's just 2 of the new epistar 320 pros .
LOL THe roots hang down into the recirculating 20 gallon hydro reservoir. But you knew that right , Hmm... THese pot these leaves are super big n fat like cabbage, must be indica dominant. First time growin Kush strain from seed , seems to really like Mars 1200. peace.
I feel that the new pro series panels are truly worth it, the pro series seems to have upgraded drivers so even though you pull less wattage from the wall the drivers actually turn more of that wattage to usable power my the diodes (so they are more efficient) and CREE diodes are universally considered the most efficient chips as well so the more wattage that goes from the driver to the diode with provide a higher lux/par/lumen output then a panel that pulls less..
so in conclusion i would say the bigger style CREE panel should cover you area perfectly and you should be able to save some money on the electric bill
Many thanks Sara.
I know its not like even near any professional studies or anything but i keep journals of my every step and mite population and stuff. so its better info for people who just noticed a mite problem then no info at all. in a couple of weeks i will post the results of the final product with mite and destroyer mites in. it will be interesting. at this moment the destroyer mites are not getting rid of the mite problem on these last untreated plants but they seems to keep them at bay around the bigger leafs all buds looks very clean still. but the tea treated plants just looked so much more healthy than these way later in the bloom stage. i would at anytime use those teas again on my plants if in need of a fast solution to the problem. actually i think if i had started that treatment on vegging plants i could eliminate those mites real good before flipping the switch. with no flowers to be concerned about. further more the plants actually really seemed to enjoy the tea with the foliarspray with aloe vera that i just applied every time lights went of. leafs was all happy and jumpy in the mornings after
If you guys give me the thumps up on the final posts on the subject i will collect my writings about it and post it in the Pest and problem section on 420.
Hi, Stoney, 2pcs Reflector96 will be able to cover 4'x4 area during veg, during flower, they two can cover 4'x3'. Since you have HPS, why not add more light... You can supplement the light with HPS. They three will make up for each other.