- Thread starter
- #981
I grew these, the sativas and indicas, in the same soil. It wasn't strain specific soil. I wanted to see what the differences were so I could adjust towards an indica soil. All it wanted was less fungal dominance, so I added microbes. It worked well enough to notice. But like I said, the experiment stopped there as I didn't need any more indica.
Lol we’re saying the same thing in different ways. Of course the indica just wanted a more bacterial environment, it has the same diet as sativas just on a different timeline. If you’ve already got soil suited for growing cannabis then the only issue you would have is any piggy phenos. Indicas and sativas eat the same, at different rates.
This does make me wonder about myco though. If indicas prefer bacterial dominant do they even want a myco connection? If they do, do you think they’d have a different relationship? For instance I can see sativas running myco full bore and giving them the conductor spot but I can see indicas linking with myco, treating it like an assistant and only providing 15% versus the 30 sativas give. Does that make sense?
There may be more to it, or a better way, I just found it cool that the plant indicated it wanted less fungal dominance, and changed the ph to suit itself.
It's possible that if I didn't tea them that the plant would have eventually raised it's microbial levels on its own.
There’s zero doubt in my mind that the plant could change its environment to suit it. We see it all the time and have seen it specifically in plants. Jungles, prairies, plains, etc. didn’t start that way, they’re part of the cycle.
There’s also little doubt in my mind that if left alone the plant still wouldn’t have had an issue shifting its environment.
However, as we both know, this is extremely resource intensive. Just propping up the system costs the plant 30% of its energy, I can’t imagine if it was shifting its entire medium as well. Due to cannabis being an annual this is a relatively heavy price to pay in both time and resources.
However, from what we know of plants, they think more about the future than we ever do. A plant would willingly sacrifice its life to ensure the area will be better suited to future generations. It would likely expend a great majority of its energy doing this. It also would cause confusion in the uptake during growth. All of this adds up to a pretty heavy toll on your final quality and yield but makes for a perfect environment for newer plants to grow in.
Nature is a force of its own that blows my mind with everything we learn about it. It makes me so sad for the time and knowledge we have lost to arrogant abrahamic religions that treat nature as a resource to be exploited.