- Thread starter
- #421
When I first started researching everything I looked into UV lighting. After finding this article in a medical journal I decided not to.
Indoor grown cannabis yield increased proportionally with light intensity, but ultraviolet radiation did not affect yield or cannabinoid content - PMC
I am going to be honest.....I didn't read the article. I skimmed it a little and jumped to the conclusion which stated UV lighting didn't add a benefit to commercial operations. I was reading something that was saying using UV lighting in greenhouses can help reduce bacteria's and fungus and this article came to mind and I decided to look at it again. I thought even though it determined UV lighting didn't increase the CBD and THC levels enough to apply to a commercial operation that maybe it would be at the personal level. When revisiting this article I realized they only looked at the CBD and THC levels in the plant tissue. The article mentioned the effects of the UV lighting on the trichomes but not in depth. The article showed 3 trichomes pics. One of the control plant with no UV lighting, a pic of a plant with UVA and the 3rd with UVA and UVB lighting. The control plant with no UV lighting had the least trichomes, the one with UVA had more and the one with UVA and UVB had the most.
I feel like the conclusion to this article may be a little flawed. Doesn't more trichomes mean more strength? And maybe it isn't flawed because one of the things they were looking for was to see if the UV lighting would trigger a secondary metabolite which it didn't.
Indoor grown cannabis yield increased proportionally with light intensity, but ultraviolet radiation did not affect yield or cannabinoid content - PMC
I am going to be honest.....I didn't read the article. I skimmed it a little and jumped to the conclusion which stated UV lighting didn't add a benefit to commercial operations. I was reading something that was saying using UV lighting in greenhouses can help reduce bacteria's and fungus and this article came to mind and I decided to look at it again. I thought even though it determined UV lighting didn't increase the CBD and THC levels enough to apply to a commercial operation that maybe it would be at the personal level. When revisiting this article I realized they only looked at the CBD and THC levels in the plant tissue. The article mentioned the effects of the UV lighting on the trichomes but not in depth. The article showed 3 trichomes pics. One of the control plant with no UV lighting, a pic of a plant with UVA and the 3rd with UVA and UVB lighting. The control plant with no UV lighting had the least trichomes, the one with UVA had more and the one with UVA and UVB had the most.
I feel like the conclusion to this article may be a little flawed. Doesn't more trichomes mean more strength? And maybe it isn't flawed because one of the things they were looking for was to see if the UV lighting would trigger a secondary metabolite which it didn't.