Thanks Smokey.
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I try to use pretty dry soil so the water already there doesn't mess with the results.It's worked for me but I found that it was best if I did it a couple days after feeding when the soil was still slightly wet otherwise needed to add more water.
Well that's not the same one. I'm sorry Shed. Maybe I deleted the wrong one.Here's mine:
You don't have to pH the nutes as you said HG. Over time, the pH in the medium can drift up causing the nutrients to be locked out. Megacrop uses a high nitrate based nitrogen, so this naturally causes the pH to rise in the substrate. In my opinion it is more noticeable in soilless media as opposed to soil.Thank you, smokey and Sauga. The instructions are helpful. However, I thought you didn't have to pH when using MegaCrop with ProMix?
What MrSauga said, and I would wait until just before your next watering.So, should I do the slurry test on all of them or just the ones that are yellowing? And, should I do it the day before the next watering?
See if the below info helps HG.Does anyone know why I can't reply to multiple quotes in one post?
See if the below info helps HG.
To reply adding a quote from a particular post, use the Reply button found below every post (pictured above). This will quote the post and insert the quote directly into the compose box. If you want to quote multiple different posts in one reply post, tap/click the + Quote button (pictured above) on each post that you wish to quote and use the Insert quotes button to place them in the compose area.
You don't have to pH the nutes as you said HG. Over time, the pH in the medium can drift up causing the nutrients to be locked out. Megacrop uses a high nitrate based nitrogen, so this naturally causes the pH to rise in the substrate. In my opinion it is more noticeable in soilless media as opposed to soil.
There are many reasons why the pH may drift, but you never know if it's an issue until the slurry test is done.
What MrSauga said, and I would wait until just before your next watering.
Slurry test them all while you're doing it so you'll know.
Thank you, Sauga. I'm on a laptop not a phone/tablet.
I tried the instructions in red above and all it did was post with none of the quotes listed.
The info I posted was from the tutorial here. I didn't quote it so the OP wasn't chasing threads. I saved her from trying to find it in the link.so I followed MrSauga's directions exactly as posted.
Yes, it's a bit different than how <REDACTED> presents it,
If you, he, and she are each making statements about three different things...
But if the goal in wanting to use the thing is simple economy, it should work fine for you.
besides
You can highlight the text you find helpful, hit the quote button, and accumulate all the pertinent information as you read.
Not sure why you feel the need to redact anything though. Apple, Microsoft, Google, and Mozilla are not sponsors here!
Also, you never stopped shrugging </SHRUGS>
Always a good idea.I'm trying not to get banned this week.
I prefer :shrugs: to conform to the style sheet of the site.
I just (almost) always open each person's message (that I am replying to portions of) in a separate tab, work in each tab, copy tabs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 and paste them into tab 1, then submit the message and kill the other tabs. Actually, it's tabs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, plus tab 2 - because I need to keep the original message thread open in tab 1. I do that because <REDACTED> does not appear to deal with nested quotes very well, and seeing what the person who I am replying to was replying to helps me with context, understanding, et cetera. It's odd, really, because <REDACTED> is capable of parsing nested quotes, at least to the first level.
In other words, I wasn't familiar with the process - so I followed MrSauga's directions exactly as posted. Yes, it's a bit different than how <REDACTED> presents it, but it still functions. After I selected the previous four posts by using their +Quote links, and then used the "Insert quotes... link that appeared (after I selected the first message to quote) beside the Attach files one, I gotan annoyinga helpful pop-up that allowed me to change the order of the quotes before having them all dumped into one reply box.
This is not the behavior that you are getting?
If you run a script-blocker in your web browser in order to stop websites from running scripts on your computer, you have to approve the 420magazine.com one for full forum functionality. But, aside from that, it should work the same for everyone.
<SHRUGS> I don't use it because of the above reason, but also because I sometimes chop up people's quoted text. If you, he, and she are each making statements about three different things... but your posts only have the second thing in common, and the first thing was only mentioned by "he and she," then I might break all of the posts up so that I can place the stuff together that belongs together. But if the goal in wanting to use the thing is simple economy, it should work fine for you.
Two more questions, then, and I'll be out (in regards to this topic, I mean ) :
1. Are you at least seeing the
"Insert quotes...
link thing appear to the immediate right of the Attach files one, after you select at least one post via its +Quote link thing?
2. After selecting all of the messages (via +Quote) that you wish to use... are you, instead of using that "Insert quotes... link, trying to use the ↩Reply link? Because that doesn't work.
So...how's the slurry testing of the pH going?