- Thread starter
- #161
Okay, how about we look at 4 weeks to the day of flower on my very first plant I ever grew? This was under blurple LED and grown in a closet. The journal is here showing these pics at week 4. That should be a more fair comparison.
When plants grow in the wild, for millions of years they have been able to feed themselves what they need, when they need it from the soil. Growing with synthetic nutrients does rob the plant from being able to feed itself. Instead we literally force feed the plants with nutrients made with organic or synthetic acids that chelate our nutrients so the plants have no choice but to uptake them. The plants will do what they can to adapt but when certain nutrients are not in high enough supply the yield will suffer. Wouldn't it be far better to have plenty of NPK and micronutrients available at all times and let the plant decide what it needs and how much?
Sorry, I do not buy into that philosophy or forcing anything into the plant via bottled nutes. Tissue samples do not support that one bit. If that were true, there would be a radical change in the plants makeup when using bloom food and there would be a drastic decrease in N and a spike in P in the plants tissue. That just doesn't show up. Now I do subscribe to providing adequate amounts of nutrients of each element/mineral and the plant will choose what it needs from there. Speaking of soil and nature, where in nature does the soil drastically change in nutrient composition when a plant transitions to flower? Nature does not provide "bloom food". It's one constant "formula" from start to finish.