Randoobula
Well-Known Member
Well I through it all back in and tried once more to decarb. At about 250 it started to slowly bubble up. So I let this happen for about 50 min and took it off. I tried 1 ml and slept great but still no high. Going to experiment with dosing today and see what happens. But at this point I'm still a little disappointed in my results.
Hey Seven!
Looking back I see that you used a ratio of 436 grams of bud to about 1000 ml oil. If I'm not mistaken, this is about the ratio Psycro uses.
The FHO Ive made was about half that much oil. I made smaller batches... 220g/ 275 ml and 180 grams/ 225 ml. My very first dose was 7 drops and it was an amazing experience. Within 3-4 days I felt very little from 7 drops and went to ten. Same thing happened. I'm convinced that the THC level is adequate, but for some reason tolerance is built very quickly for me with FHO. Using CCO, I can remain at the same dose for a month with little change.
I sent a bottle of FHO to my friend who consumes much more oil daily than I do and has always had a higher tolerance than me. He started out at 10 drops three times a day and while he felt relaxed and peaceful, he was surprised to not feel the traditional head high he expected. He took 30 drops/1 ml at once and felt a bit of a head high and much more body, but still not what he was accustomed to with CCO.
I don't know what kind of tolerance you have, but if it is anything like my friends, he was just starting to feel a head high at 30 drops, so based on ratio and all things being relative strain wise etc, with your ratio bud/oil you should start feeling it at twice that or 60 drops which is 2 ml. But then all things aren't relative!
I believe it's going to take much time and experimentation before we come to understand better the differences between CCO and FHO. Sharing and comparing our results will help a great deal, but each individuals physiology, cannabinoid profile, terpene profiles, quality of decarb, bud to oil ratios, THC percentages, maturity of THC and other Cannabinoids at time harvested... are all variables that require that we each become researchers and scientists, tracking every detail that we can in order to dial in our processes and dosing.
I'm sorry you don't have a warm and fuzzy about your oil. Confidence in our medicine is so important. I tend to question myself at every turn... did I miss something?... should I have done this or that?... am I getting the best results possible from my efforts?... it's all good though. Knowledge is power and because we are basically pioneers in this, it is just going to take trial and error to learn and improve our craft.
All my best to ya! Hope my experience can help in some small way.
One more thing(and this will be a small novel!)... Something I learned when I owned a heating business is that when trouble shooting a problem, we look so hard to find the origination of a problem that we can get mindset that blocks us from recognizing the real problem. Keeping this in mind has helped me a great deal over the years. What makes the most sense out of the starting gate isn't always the case. Example: I'd spent a few hours believing I had an ignition problem, tested and retested all the components, only to find there was a carbon build-up I couldn't see without pulling burner that was impinging upon the flame. Adjustments made while stuck on stupid had to be readjusted once try problem fixed.
How this applies here is that we focus heavily upon decarb, so naturally it would be one of the first things we look at when something doesn't seem right. But could it's potency have anything to do with one or more of the other variables listed above? Could it be that the characteristics of FHO are just different than what we expect because we haven't ever experienced a true full extraction which includes the plants natural terpene profile? I cannot answer these questions for you OR me at this point. But I aim to figure it out... for me and for those I help treat. It's just going to take time.