Fanleaf's Huge 42 COB Array Build Plus Other Builds

Anyone know of good reading material on how cannabis uses light and what spectrums and how much? Figure I need to do some studying before I add anything else.

Icemud spent some time looking into spectrum. Search his threads or pop in and ask him directly. He has some utubes, too, but I don't know if he talked about spectrum in them. I remember that different colors penetrated/reflected/refracted differently in the canopy, for instance, and yes plants do use green ...

:Namaste:
 
Thanks fan. I found a pic of your 25 cob setup on your 1g/w grow thread. I can't see it completely but I think I figured out how to get 18 cobs in a 4x4. Does this look right to you?

X = 3000K
0 = 5000K

X....X....X
...0....0 (these are spaced between the X's)
X....X....X
...0....0
X....X....X
...0....0
X....X....X



This setup spreads out the 5000k more efficiently than using 16 cobs. I'd prefer 16 cobs or less since 18 is a few buck more. :thumb:

This might be off topic, but I was watching growmou5's take on CRI and he stated the higher CRI come at a cost of producing less light. Even if it gives a higher/better spectrum. Is that why the higher CRI's are used as much? Less light? How does this does relate to photons produced by light?

I'm exhausted so forgive me if this is a stupid q's... i'm brain farting now. :sleep:

I would think
X. X. X. X
..O. O. O
X. X. X. X
..O. O. O
X. X. X. X
Looks like it would spread better and still has your 18 cobs for the 4x4. Peace!!
 
Very nice Graytail. I always enjoy Icemuds stuff. Very interesting. If Im not mistaking I may have started that conversation in the mars thread when I once asked Sara why they dont put just a few green led's in their lights. She said it would do nothing and the plants dont need it.
Icemuds posts there nail it.
 
The technical stuff is kinda of hard to find on 420, everyone has a different answer. I'm old I guess I still like books lol. I'll check out icemuds threads. I have parts for a 4 ft 730nm initiator, need to get it up along with the uv lights

I like to stick to the science.
Getting info from cannabis related sites is often biased.
Two of my favourite sources for video presentations on plant biology are khan Academy and PBS's CrashCourse

Plant biology | Science |
Khan Academy


And pbs has a multi part series on plant biology.
Photosynthesis: Crash Course Biology #8 - YouTube
 
I like to stick to the science.
Getting info from cannabis related sites is often biased.
Two of my favourite sources for video presentations on plant biology are khan Academy and PBS's CrashCourse

Plant biology | Science |
Khan Academy


And pbs has a multi part series on plant biology.
Photosynthesis: Crash Course Biology #8 - YouTube
The science Icemud presented in Graytails post is nothing but pure science. A whole lot of scientific research papers is all he posted. It shows that green can in fact be absorbed better than red or blue for photosynthesis in intense light situations. Nothing but science in pdf from actual scientists from Icemud. He has probably done more research in spectrum than all members of 420 combined.
 
The science Icemud presented in Graytails post is nothing but pure science. A whole lot of scientific research papers is all he posted. It shows that green can in fact be absorbed better than red or blue for photosynthesis in intense light situations. Nothing but science in pdf from actual scientists from Icemud. He has probably done more research in spectrum than all members of 420 combined.

I didn't claim otherwise.
Anyways as my meter has been brought into question I've contacted UPRtek to purchase a PAR spectrometer. Pretty pricy but full spectrum analysis is worth it.
UPRTEK PAR200 Quantum Spectrometer PC analysis software - YouTube
 
I didn't claim otherwise.
Anyways as my meter has been brought into question I've contacted UPRtek to purchase a PAR spectrometer. Pretty pricy but full spectrum analysis is worth it.
UPRTEK PAR200 Quantum Spectrometer PC analysis software - YouTube
Didnt mean it to sound like just your meter man. I meant mine too. Thats why I mentioned that whole flashlight to the sensor thing. Mine is known to be pretty good but still....$500 is cheap when talking about a tool in that area of science.
 
Didnt mean it to sound like just your meter man. I meant mine too. Thats why I mentioned that whole flashlight to the sensor thing. Mine is known to be pretty good but still....$500 is cheap when talking about a tool in that area of science.

This one is $3000 CDN
But full spectrum analysis over an iPad is exactly what I need.
 
This one is $3000 CDN
But full spectrum analysis over an iPad is exactly what I need.
Yeah, that would be a nice tool to have for sure. I would like to see what its ppf accuracy is with each portion of the light spectrum. Some tools will heavily favor certain parts of the spectrum. Different types of light sources mess with them too. Cool tool though.
 
Yeah, that would be a nice tool to have for sure. I would like to see what its ppf accuracy is with each portion of the light spectrum. Some tools will heavily favor certain parts of the spectrum. Cool tool though.

Supposed to be +\- 1%
Also does Kelvin conversion, BBR curves, visible and invisible spectrum analysis, cri indexing.
Sphere not included.
 
Back
Top Bottom