How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doc, how late into flower do you feel that you can safely foliar feed without risk of moldy buds?
hey bro!
I wait till there are 5 sets of leaves and the top the plant just above the second node. This method will give you 4 nice colas.
Two colas can be made by topping at the 4th node, but there will also be smaller branches underneath, which you can cleanup later.
What would you rather have for Valentine's Day? A rose, or one of these?
I'll be your valentine Doc!
I swear every time you update I think...that's it, this is as good as weed gets...but then somehow each time you outdo yourself. If this is what organics does i'm all-in!
So just to be clear... you're still spraying that cola down with teas? I wasn't sure how far into bloom to go either.
All of those above photos and different varieties look amazing!! That Chocolate Kush cola is a monster!! wow and the purple kush, those leafs look like painted art!!
Also curious about fratdoggs question, are you spraying the cola's or just the foliage and undersides?
I can't stop drooling over your plants doc, that new zealand kush is something else, but the lemon thai buds just look so perfect. I'm dreaming of how wonderful it would smell to break one open and bask in the goeyness
I'd have to say this is my favorite journal going right now
Doc,
If I use a pre mixed organic like Peace of mind, or Dr. Earth, do I still need to let the soil set 30 days before using it?
good night! doc those sound and look amazing!
"Disease-Inducing Soils. In this type of soil, plant pathogenic microorganisms such as Fusarium fungi can comprise 5 to 20 percent of the total microflora if fresh organic matter with a high nitrogen content is applied to such a soil, incompletely oxidized products can arise that are malodorous and toxic to growing plants. Such soils tend to cause frequent infestations of disease organisms, and harmful insects. Thus, the application of fresh organic matter to these soils is often harmful to crops. Probably more than 90 percent of the agricultural land devoted to crop production worldwide can be classified as having disease-inducing soil. Such soils generally have poor physical properties, and large amounts of energy are lost as "greenhouse" gases, particularly in the case of rice fields. Plant nutrients are also subject to immobilization into unavailable forms.
Disease-Suppressive Soils. The microflora of disease-suppressive soils is usually dominated by antagonistic microorganisms that produce copious amounts of antibiotics. These include fungi of the genera Penicillium, Trichoderma, and Aspergillus, and actinomycetes of the genus Streptomyces. The antibiotics they produce can have biostatic and biocidal effects on soil-borne plant pathogens, including Fusarium which would have an incidence in these soils of less than 5 percent. Crops planted in these soils are rarely affected by diseases or insect pests. Even if fresh organic matter with a high nitrogen content is applied, the production of putrescent substances is very low and the soil has a pleasant earthy odor after the organic matter is decomposed. These soils generally have excellent physical properties; for example, they readily, form water-stable aggregates and they are well-aerated, and have a high permeability to both air and water. Crop yields in the disease-suppressive soils are often slightly lower than those in synthetic soils. Highly acceptable crop yields are obtained whenever a soil has a predominance of both disease-suppressive and synthetic microorganisms.
Zymogenic Soils. These soils are dominated by a microflora that can perform useful kinds of fermentations, i.e., the breakdown of complex organic molecules into simple organic substances and inorganic materials. The organisms can be either obligate or facultative anaerobes. Such fermentation-producing microorganisms often comprise the microflora of various organic materials, i.e., crop residues, animal manures, green manures and municipal wastes including composts. After these amendments are applied to the soil, their number: and fermentative activities can increase dramatically and overwhelm the indigenous soil microflora for an indefinite period. While these microorganisms remain predominant, the soil can be classified as a zymogenic soil which is generally characterized by a) pleasant, fermentative odors especially after tillage, b) favorable soil physical properties (e.g., Increased aggregate stability, permeability, aeration and decreased resistance to tillage c) large amounts of inorganic nutrients, amino acids, carbohydrates, vitamins and other bioactive substances which can directly or indirectly enhance the growth, yield and quality of crops, d) low occupancy of Fusarium fungi which is usually less than 5 percent, and e) low production of greenhouse gases (e.g., methane, ammonia, and carbon dioxide) from croplands, even where flooded rice is grown.
Synthetic Soils. These soils contain significant populations of microorganisms which are able to fix atmospheric nitrogen and carbon dioxide into complex molecules such as amino acids, proteins and carbohydrates. Such microorganisms include photosynthetic bacteria which perform incomplete photosynthesis anaerobically, certain Phycomycetes (fungi that resemble algae), and both green algae and blue--green algae which function aerobically. All of these are photosynthetic organisms that fix atmospheric nitrogen. If the water content of these soils is stable, their fertility can be largely maintained by regular additions of only small amounts of organic materials. These soils have a low Fusarium occupancy and they are often of the disease-suppressive type. The production of gases from fields where synthetic soils are present is minimal, even for flooded rice."
A nice breakdown of the micro-organisms you are looking for in your BRIX method would be great doc. I started watering in the mice-organisms into my outside garden for summer tomatoes...
Doc,
I have been researching HB for some time and buy most of my organics from Fedco in Maine. As to the soft rock phosphate they list this:
Phosphate, Calphos Colloidal (0-2-0, 18% P: 2% readily available, 21% Ca, trace minerals) This soft-rock phosphate is an excellent choice for calcium-deficient soils as plants will take up the calcium first, freeing the phosphorus to be taken up in turn. Don’t apply lime at the same time lest plants take calcium from the lime leaving the phosphate not yet available. Colloidal phosphate contains fine clays which help sandy soils retain water and nutrients. Use combined with green manures for soil rebuilding, or by itself to give plants immediate doses of nutrients.
I'm leaning to add the lime into the bottom 2/3 so the roots in the upper 1/3 can release the phosphates. It's nice to see others excited about the prospects of HB. I'm along on this ride....and thanks.
The Nutritional Foundation of the High Brix Garden Program is Soil Remineralization
Soil remineralization is accomplished through the annual broadcast. The annual broadcast is custom formulated based upon the results of the soil test. It is formulated from the following broad categories.
Calcium-based rock powders
Calcium is present in every biological cell. It must be well supplied in order for the soil to produce top-quality. Limestone and gypsum are frequently used from this group.
Clay-based rock powders
The best in this class is soft rock phosphate. Soft rock phosphate provides many trace nutrients in addition to phosphates. These trace minerals are in a compound colloid form. Soft rock phosphate combines with limestone to form an electromagnetic field within the soil that helps soil resist water and wind erosion.
Silicate-based rock powders
Silica is on of the most often-neglected plant nutrients. It is extremely important for plant growth and in maintaining soil energy. Silicate rock powders are a virtual storehouse of broad-spectrum trace minerals. They also help increase soil paramagnetism. This type of rock powder requires microbial digestion to make the locked up nutrients available to the plants.
Carbon-based powders
These are very important energy sources that support soil microbiology. Carbon powders help balance calcium-based powders and make both the calcium and the carbon more accessible in the soil. Carbons help increase crop growth through the respiration of carbon dioxide that results from their digestion in the soil. Lastly carbon increases soil energy by increasing the ionization flow of nutrients in the magnetic lines of force.
Fertilizers for specific nutrients in short supply
It does very little good to address all the broad-spectrum rare earth minerals without first addressing the major plant nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium and the common trace minerals such as copper, iron, zinc, and manganese. Examples of fertilizers in this group would include potassium sulfate and copper sulfate. Fertilizers are only used when called for by the soil test.
I see what you are meaning here and it seems to be working...
How are you looking at the soil to see the bacterium?
I was reading in
"Mycorrhizae: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry
By Zaki Anwar Siddiqui, Mohd. Sayeed Akhtar, Kazuyoshi Futai"
that the research is moving forward on the issue of finding mycrorrhizae fungus symbioses in places where mining tailings have poisoned the area but plants still grow, finding those mycorrhizae would result in adapted ones (gene lines) that use up heavy metals faster than their counterparts. And that certain bacteria help with this process better when the mycorrhizae is established on the roots first them the bacteria is applied.
This is illuminated by your produce and particular soil that continually has both soluble and non-soluble NPK running it through 24/7, or for example using them in chemical hydro = better stable ph and water.
Further; This brix method does result in a culture growing very close to your produce and recommendations suggest a washing of all produce before consumption....
What different things have you considered in this respect; Application of a microscopic bacteria onto produce that is smoked??? And what "clean" practices eliminate this. Water curing was the only one I could find that might help this thing out...
your thoughts?