Decoding The Holy Grail: Terpene & Cannabinoid Retention: Decarb to Extraction

Hey guys what if my oven only goes to 170C instead of 110C, what should my decarbing time be now?

Hey baby, are you sure that isn't 170 degrees F? This is a standard low temp for modern ovens, and the minimum temp on my own oven. 170C is way too high for a min temp.
 
A bit off topic but I wanted to tell SweetSue thank you so much for your suggestion on the making of topical cream I made for my father in law, he tried some rso to see if it would help and he freaked out on a low dose, ( he's 75 ) he had knee replacement on one knee and still has pain and the other knee ( bone on bone ) he didn't want to do it cause it didn't work out too well. He applied it and shortly after he called me and said "God bless you this is amazing " I just wanted to share with y'all.. Good vibes and health to all those here to help and thank you for the knowledge you choose to share with this community. I pray you all grow amazing medicine to make life better.

Thank you for the update. I was thinking of him just this morning, wondering if the cream had worked. He came to mind because I was delivering some cream to a couple friends today.
 
I believe you! Maybe cause I'm in Canada with safety measures?

It's a digital oven
420-magazine-mobile1991388397.jpg
 
Best marker of nicely toasted flowers is that beautiful rust colour . .

The stuff looks right to me Canyon. I wouldn't worry about the moisture. Never seen it do that but you have way fresher bud. Great Pics! And thanks for letting me visit my little purple friend. lol I miss Ms Nova. lol
 
Hi everyone -- Could someone maybe do a brief summary of the objectives of this thread and the results so far?

Is it to try to work out the best method of decarboxylating and then the best method of extracting so as to maintain maximum THC and terpenes?

Sorry, and not to be critical, but I've ready 239 posts so far and it looks like things are still in the planning stages, is that right? Or have some kind of recommended procedures started to emerge?


Thanks!

We're still in planning stage Scientific, but this is basically what the project is hoping to accomplish.

Kicknitup1 said:
Let's see.
short version, verify, verify, verify. lol

We will know the properties of the starting mtl

Then I will compare decarb results between the jar in oven & Nova (oven will be 15 min jar warm up and then 1 hr decarb @ 240f & cool down). (or 220f if there is a consensus but I think 240 is the #) via lab test.

Then determine optimum extraction times. Testing @ 1hr, 1.5 hr & 2 hr, &... (6 hr because High Times thinks so) @150-165f. Personally, I bet you have almost all @ 2 hr. (testing will be with tcheck until we get to the final, then lab).

Then compare properties that made it into the oil vs starting mtl

I had planned on doing a terpene test on the oil unless we find out beforehand that terpenes just will not be there.

Also check efficiency of extraction by comparing oil labs to starting mtl labs.

For once we will know with no bias from someone selling a product what makes it into the oil & at what efficiency.

I will be verifying the accuracy of the tcheck also.
These tests will be with LSL & coconut oil. Not using olive for this. I had rather stick with what I know for the testing. As far as testing, there should be no difference for olive oil results.

Then we will do our own verification...by eating them. Haven't heard much about Canyon's wife yet but assuming she's on board, we will have a 3 person panel...of happy judges. I individually dose these things so everyone can hit their comfort level.

Nut shell:
* verify starting mtl
* verify decarb
* verify extraction optimums
* verify equipment reliability
* Verify oil quality from 2 kinds of decarb

There will be a couple more tests added, in all likelihood, as funds allow, but this is the basics.
 
Hi everyone -- Could someone maybe do a brief summary of the objectives of this thread and the results so far?

Is it to try to work out the best method of decarboxylating and then the best method of extracting so as to maintain maximum THC and terpenes?

Sorry, and not to be critical, but I've ready 239 posts so far and it looks like things are still in the planning stages, is that right? Or have some kind of recommended procedures started to emerge?


Thanks!

Welcome to the thread,
That is close. When the decarb is done is still getting kicked around. We are trying to get a good decarbed infusion into a carrier oil without loosing all the terpenes.

Wednesday will be the first full day committed to whatever we can discover with what we have to work with. Until then we are as you say "In the planning stages" What little we know is self taught for the most part.

The fresh harvest infusion was something to try to get things started. The results were not what I expected, that was cool.

If you want to post anything you know, please do.

We want to keep an open source approach to the thread. It can take any direction. The idea is to gather ideas and try them.

Best
 
I believe you! Maybe cause I'm in Canada with safety measures?

It's a digital oven
420-magazine-mobile1991388397.jpg

If you have a manual, check to see what scale they used, because in all seriousness, 170C isn't a minimum temperature. :laughtwo:
 
Hi everyone -- Could someone maybe do a brief summary of the objectives of this thread and the results so far?

Is it to try to work out the best method of decarboxylating and then the best method of extracting so as to maintain maximum THC and terpenes?

Sorry, and not to be critical, but I've ready 239 posts so far and it looks like things are still in the planning stages, is that right? Or have some kind of recommended procedures started to emerge?


Thanks!

No worries. You are correct on the objectives. It is in the planning stages. The tests will be next week. Actually, they have started. We have already tested the starting material. We are gathering last minute facts and other people's experiences before finalizing exactly what we do. But basically, we already know what we are going to do. I think in the first of the thread we state the objectives. But, as we put the word out for any testing that had already been done, we opened up a few more questions. Funds will dictate exactly what all we cover. But at a minimum the original objectives will be completed baring some really bad luck. lol

I already know I'm not going to want to go home.
 
Hi everyone -- Could someone maybe do a brief summary of the objectives of this thread and the results so far?

Is it to try to work out the best method of decarboxylating and then the best method of extracting so as to maintain maximum THC and terpenes?

Sorry, and not to be critical, but I've ready 239 posts so far and it looks like things are still in the planning stages, is that right? Or have some kind of recommended procedures started to emerge?


Thanks!

No worries. You are correct on the objectives. It is in the planning stages. The tests will be next week. Actually, they have started. We have already tested the starting material. We are gathering last minute facts and other people's experiences before finalizing exactly what we do. But basically, we already know what we are going to do. I think in the first of the thread we state the objectives. But, as we put the word out for any testing that had already been done, we opened up a few more questions. Funds will dictate exactly what all we cover. But at a minimum the original objectives will be completed baring some really bad luck. lol

I already know I'm not going to want to go home.
 
420-magazine-mobile1947406459.jpg

This is the graph everyone worked from for years. We recently discovered it means little for our purposes due to the solvent used and the process followed. That's in great part why Canyon and Kicknitup are proceeding with their project. We need more dependable info with real-world applications to work from.

That is in fact the graph that I have been using for years. It seemed to show that a slow, low temperature decarb was as effective as a fast, high temperature decarb, so based on the advice in that article, I've been using a 15 minute drying phase at 220F followed by 90 minutes at of decarb at the same temperature, for a total of 115 minutes, which seems to have worked well, and judging by the low odor, hasn't been driving off all the low molecular weight components.

I have never covered the pan in the oven because I guessed that any molecules trapped by the foil covering would simply condense on the surfaces and be lost anyway.

Even if there are objections to "the solvents used and processes followed" in that article, it seems to me that it's still the best information that we've got at this point. I hate to see the proverbial baby thrown out with the bathwater.

OK, that's my understanding for whatever it may be worth. I'm following this thread with interest.

(And just by the bye, I would also be interested in seeing hard science--or as close as we can get to that--for methods to increase bioavailability with lecithin, etc.)

:Namaste:
 
Hey HealthFreak. I have been wanting to give beef jerky a go for so long, now...do you have a good infused recipe that has worked out well for you. ?

Hmm. You got me thinking , I never made infused jerky, but have made jerky with some honey and teriyaki a little soy sauce or brags aminos , I don't see why we couldn't infuse some honey and have a go at it . Let's see who has a go at it first and let's share how it turns out .. :)
 
(And just by the bye, I would also be interested in seeing hard science--or as close as we can get to that--for methods to increase bioavailability with lecithin, etc.)

There is a good bit of documentation out there on encapsulation and lecithin/bio availability. I read a bunch about it in the food industry but I don't have anything at my fingertips. Sue probably has it memorized. lol

BTW, your decarb temps have to be close. I used 220 for 110 min for a good while then bumped to 240 @1 hr. I bet they get close to the same place. What we have found is that CBN does not form as quickly as the chart implies with our style decarbs. (meaning not CCO in n-hexane on a glass plate). Let's get the lab test back on the Nova decarb and we can talk more about time/temp.
 
Thank you for the update. I was thinking of him just this morning, wondering if the cream had worked. He came to mind because I was delivering some cream to a couple friends today.

Thanks for the thoughts , I used a total of 12 grams of bud and 10 grams of trim and more about 3.5 cups of grapes seed oil and sum bees wax
 
Scientific...

Do you have anything uhhh scientific that would help us? From the moniker you sound like my kind of guy.

My science background and interests are what brought me to this thread! I'll jump in if I think I have anything useful to offer. Right now, like everyone else here, I'm just really curious about how to optimize all aspects of extraction. I think it's fantastic that actual lab testing is now available at reasonable prices.

I look forward to when we eventually get cannabis off of Schedule 1 so the people with nice labs and federal research money can get to work on this substance that is used by so many and has been for thousands of years.
 
Back
Top Bottom