- Thread starter
- #61
CrimsonEcho
Well-Known Member
Ok another detail i just noticed. Well actually remembered. There is a general consensus about watts per square feet and i always though a hobby growers specs would never need to match the ones who grow commercially. Now this grow is currently proving my hypothesis -I usually never utilize the 4x4 but i vaped all my Dinachem and Northern Lights and Blue Kush so that gave an opportunity to go for it- hahha.
I have 450 watts reaching to the diodes in my 4x4 grow tent. Which makes 28w per square foot. And in an environment without any additional co2 the results speak for themselves. Happy plants, sexy colas and just leaning branches. So i don’t see a reason to go with 50w per square foot (as mostly some hid guys suggest when talking about leds) unless you are supplementing co2. Lots of diodes, even distribution thus better penetration while experiencing all the cost saving benefits of leds. 4x4 is 1000w hid. 55% less energy usage and still heavy clusters. I love leds. I think everyone should switch. Hahah.
I have 450 watts reaching to the diodes in my 4x4 grow tent. Which makes 28w per square foot. And in an environment without any additional co2 the results speak for themselves. Happy plants, sexy colas and just leaning branches. So i don’t see a reason to go with 50w per square foot (as mostly some hid guys suggest when talking about leds) unless you are supplementing co2. Lots of diodes, even distribution thus better penetration while experiencing all the cost saving benefits of leds. 4x4 is 1000w hid. 55% less energy usage and still heavy clusters. I love leds. I think everyone should switch. Hahah.