The Bard
Well-Known Member
Thank you so much for taking the time to reply to my rudimentary questions! Yup, I already had in my notes your recos of 50PPM and 2x daily, so I will definitely be following those aspects to the letter. I do have some Blueberry seeds (fem, not auto), but they are not on the docket right now.
Your personal experience of the female traits having greater impact on the outcome seem to agree with what I have read elsewhere, so that seems like good confirmation.
On the last topic, that of selfing… (not to be confused with selfies)
I don't think I worded this last question very well. If my ultimate goal is to multiply the number of strong, vibrant DDA seeds in my collection, do you think the likelihood of success would be better if I:
1) Grew two plants from separate seeds, plant A and plant B. Reverse plant A (or a branch on it at any rate) and use the pollen on plant B's pistils; or,
2) Grew just one plant, reversed one branch, and then used that pollen on buds on the same plant.
I think approach #2 is closer to your crossing clones illustration, as there is only one set of genes in the equation. Do you think there are any advantages to approach #1 in terms of genetic diversity/vigor? I guess there might be drawbacks to #2 as well. The practical side of more space for two plants, more expense, etc. But also that same "diversity" might mean that desirable traits from plant A, for example, might get lost in the crossing with plant B.
Behind all of this is the desire to end up with a good collection of strong DDA genetics in the form of seeds, which I can then use for further crossing with other autos. Kind of like your DDA x NL throughout this journal.
At any rate, thank you again for your kind responses!
Your personal experience of the female traits having greater impact on the outcome seem to agree with what I have read elsewhere, so that seems like good confirmation.
On the last topic, that of selfing… (not to be confused with selfies)
So basically you're wondering about the quality of the pollen produced by a plant that is reversed?
I don't think I worded this last question very well. If my ultimate goal is to multiply the number of strong, vibrant DDA seeds in my collection, do you think the likelihood of success would be better if I:
1) Grew two plants from separate seeds, plant A and plant B. Reverse plant A (or a branch on it at any rate) and use the pollen on plant B's pistils; or,
2) Grew just one plant, reversed one branch, and then used that pollen on buds on the same plant.
I think approach #2 is closer to your crossing clones illustration, as there is only one set of genes in the equation. Do you think there are any advantages to approach #1 in terms of genetic diversity/vigor? I guess there might be drawbacks to #2 as well. The practical side of more space for two plants, more expense, etc. But also that same "diversity" might mean that desirable traits from plant A, for example, might get lost in the crossing with plant B.
Behind all of this is the desire to end up with a good collection of strong DDA genetics in the form of seeds, which I can then use for further crossing with other autos. Kind of like your DDA x NL throughout this journal.
At any rate, thank you again for your kind responses!