Hiya, nurse!
WOOHOO, I've finally caught up on
ONE thread. And I think I skipped most of November's posts to do it...
Finding ways to develop conversations in small settings may be the way to go.
There's truth in the old saying about the IQ of a group of people being equal to it's least intelligent member :rolleyes3 .
Unfortunately, we face the same issue that those wishing to help drug addicts, those with mental illnesses, et cetera: It can be next to impossible to teach those who
refuse to listen.
I also came to the conclusion some years ago that appearing to be a "cannabis fanboy/fangirl" to folks can lead directly to the above situation. If one's speech/actions resemble that of the FANatic, it doesn't help.
Smaller discussion groups tend to help avoid even the appearance of the above. So can being somewhat circumspect. To the err... nonbeliever (
), "CANNABIS SAVED MY LIFE!!!" might appear to be so much horsesh!t, and cause them to immediately shut down the listening area of their brain. If, OtOH, one states that they reached a point where they had to make drastic life changes in order to greatly improve both their health and the quality of their life, and then go on to list those changes - stop eating "factory chicken," adding filtration devices so that they are able to actually consume clean water, eat more non-meat items in order to have a more
balanced diet, take steps to ensure that as much as the meat that they eat is of the "free-range" type, taking three cannabis oil capsules evenly spaced throughout the day, eat as many locally-grown fruits & vegetables as possible instead of buying stuff that's been trucked in after being grown/harvested in uncertain (and possibly
unclean) conditions, cutting out all caffeine after 2:00pm, ensuring that one's environment is completely dark when trying to sleep-- At this point, the person you're having the conversation with just might
ask you just WtF you mean about the cannabis and how you "think" such a thing is actually helpful, because it sort of "sneaked in" to their brain and, so, they are now forced to process it, lol. Thus, opening a discussion into more of the specifics of cannabis' health benefits.
IDK. It was time for a ramble
.
Being angry about it isn't helping us.
<SHRUGS> It can be an anger-provoking thing. Might as well channel it usefully instead of heading to the bar where you know that some @sshole will stumble past, spilling your drink and giving you the means to bleed off that anger, lol.
I figure anger is just like any other emotion. It can be a great motivator - but it can also take over if one is not careful, leading one to operate through one's
feelings instead of
thinking. Kennedy got p!ssed-off at the Soviets, so in 1961, he declared that we'd set foot on Luna by the end of the decade (and he stated this less than 60 years after the
airplane had been invented). Of course, it then took a great many people's
thinking to accomplish this, lol...
We went from feeding our bodies the food evolved to be a perfect fit to having access completely restricted.
There's more money in processed food. After all, then you have to pay the <BLEEPS> to do the processing.
Look at the list of countries that have the greatest life-expectancy (BtW, depending on which particular list you're looking at the United States either ranks 31st, just below Costa Rica and just above Cuba, or 43rd, just below French Guiana and just above Lebanon, or...). I very much doubt things such as processed lunch "meat" is any kind of staple in the diets of the average person in the top ten countries on any of those lists. And CHICKEN!(!!!) Most people don't realize that, in addition to the intolerable conditions they're most often raised under in this country... that we've mucked around with the things so much - and so badly - that they are not, legally speaking, even considered to be an animal any more here.[/RANT]
And "Potted Meat Food Product," lol. Never trust a food that's so messed up that the producers not only have to tell you it's actually "meat" in the name, they also have to call it a
food product. FFS!
Our governments went to great expense
Ah, but it's not like the government (any government) is spending ITS money, lol. What's a few (tens of) billions of dollars - when it's other people that are the ones being forced to pay it?
to convince us cannabis was dangerous.
Governments, as a rule - both historically and in the present-day - have a strong tendency to always have some kind of "evil opponent." There are several reasons for this behavior trait. And if they cannot find one, they'll
create one.
Those who hold to the belief that their governments are always looking out for their best interests
...are in DIRE need of a keeper, someone to feed them and change their diapers for them
.
Indoor growing can be done in any climate.
It's... <CHECKS THERMOMETER> 54°F in here right now (I know, I know - but I've been feeling a bit "under the weather" lately, so I've really cranked up the heat these last couple of days!). What do you suggest I grow here? Kale, LMAO? Auto-flowers, I suppose.
Hey, that reminds me: I do wish there was some kind of resource that lists the temperature ranges in which each strain of cannabis would thrive. As it is, we're left to look at strain descriptions, reviews, and grow reports for each strain that we're interested in, separately. And, often, even then it's just a case of
inference. For example, I recently read that Paradise Seeds' Nebula wasn't the best strain for high temperatures. Does this mean that the strain will thrive under lower(-than average) temperatures? Well...
Maybe.
Doggone it, I lost a couple of tabs I had quoted text ready to paste in and reply to, in regards to autoflowers beginning to flower when their taproot encountered the bottom of the pot. Oh well...
I never became a theoretical astrophysicist like I intended to when I was eight years old, but I do still like to theorize. One theory I have is that, considering where ruderalis strains originated, that this might have something to do with those plants' roots (in their natural setting) encountering hard, frozen soil / permafrost at a certain depth. Another theory is that it might not be completely about the root(s) reaching the bottom of the container, but more about the ratio of roots to media (or, more accurately, the ratio of roots/plant to freely-available nutrients in that media). We try to ensure that our plants have an adequate supply of nutrients available at all times, but we often don't meet with 100% success. How many people have feed their plants, only to see them "perk up" afterwards? This, IMHO, is a sign that nutrients were lacking before said plants were fed. This theory might go some way towards explaining why, for example, a lot of auto-flowering plants grown in DWC not only grow larger, but also grow (for a)
longer (period of time). And then there's the fact that, if someone has multiple auto-flowering plants of the same strain growing in the same environmental conditions, and they switch half of them to "bloom nutes," thereby feeding those plants less nitrogen, that those plants tend to end up in the flowering phase first.
IDK. Another word for theorizing... is
guessing .