Hey Sue - because you mentioned HomeBox tent recently I just wanted to pop back here to say if you do, I recommend only considering their very top line range (the Evolution)> And even then, I’d look into the manufacturing. I ordered a mid range one - it ended up not being in stock so they (retailer) sent me the lower end one and a small refund. Well, it’s super light leaky and I think it’s going to be refunded (not sure if i’ll need to return it - it sounded like maybe not). ANyhoo - here is one of the pics i took to show the retailer the leaks (a 25 second long exposure, in the dark)
But I’ve realised that cheaper means more stuffing around with it, stiff zips etc. and all of that is proving really problematic for me physically. Sometimes for extra ease of use (which I need), you just have to spend a bit more.
I’m still taken with the Homebox top line range and the white “Par+” lining, but a bit dubious about the quality of their mid and lower range so that makes me wonder.
Is the long exposure time artificially inflating the (perception of the) amount of light leakage? Or merely allowing the camera to "see" what your eyes see?
This brings up a general question: Many companies, regardless of whether it be grow tents, automobiles, et cetera, offer multiple products at different price points. Personally, I am of the opinion that even the "base model" should
fulfill the basic purpose of the product. An automobile manufacturer's cheapest model should still be capable of providing basic transportation from point A to point B even if it isn't an overly comfortable ride, cooling is provided by opening the windows (by turning the crank handles instead of tapping buttons), entertainment(?) is provided by one of the passengers singing, et cetera. A grow tent should have the ability to support a
reasonable amount of weight from its ceiling (which is not the same as being able to stand in for your chin-up bar on a regular basis), have
reasonably reflective walls (at least 75% reflectivity, because I'd consider less than that to not only be poor, but
unreasonable, too)... and to keep light OUT during the dark cycle. More money should add more features, better durability, or both.
BtW, if someone sent me that picture and used it to demand warranty coverage (or refund), and I was some <BLEEP> in a suit, I'd probably reply that you needed to sit inside the darkened tent and take a picture to see if enough light was actually getting
in to potentially cause an issue. Which might seem like just a way to fight the customer's claim (and it probably would be, in practice) - but how much light does get in, during lights-off, when the room it's in is illuminated as per normal? Presumably, neither you nor most customers are using 1KW HIDs as room lighting, lol - on the other hand, most rooms have
windows, and sunlight coming through one can be pretty bright. And IF enough light can get inside the tent under normal conditions (and daylight seems like a normal condition to me, along with average indoor artificial lighting levels), then that's a non-functional product, IMHO.
Aside from that, I perceive that pattern of holes as being a sign of poor quality. I'm guessing the zipper in my jeans are attached better than that, else I'd have to replace my pants far more often
. And my pants were almost certainly cheaper.