Have you noticed a difference with the panels?
Thats a good question
@JustMeds
Heres what I can tell you for sure about QB light source vs HPS light source.
The hanging footprint of the 2 x 240SAMS is about the same as the 2 x 400watt HPS lights.
I have measured the DC voltage and current across the QB panels and recorded 99.6 volts and 2100 mA, so I can say with confidence that they are each producing 209 watts, or 418 watts total, compared to 800 watts total from the HPS lights. Thats a savings of 47.75% on power. I pay 0.124 $/kwh. Assuming 65 days veg at 18/6 and 65 days flower at 12/12
800w HPS (((1170 hrs veg + 780 hrs flower) X 0.8 kw) X 0.124 $/kwh) =
$193.44 power/grow.
418w QB (((1170 hrs veg + 780 hrs flower) X 0.418 kw) X 0.124 $/kwh) =
$101.72 power/grow
Now thats a great deal......but if you order now... we'll also include an average
(taken over 19 test points on the grid) of
66% more light intensity (ppfd) over the entire canopy at no extra charge to you.
Just for shits and giggles $193.44 X 1.66% = $321.11 power/grow for the same ppfd as the QB's. So if we compare the same ppfd of the HPS to the ppfd of the QB's over an entire grow the power savings are actually 68.3%.
Other noticeable benefits.
- Δ
T in the tent is -5⁰C (-9⁰F)
- Using the same ratchet hangers I have gained 10" of head room in the tent.
- Light penetration into the canopy is very very good.
- I'll recover 100% of the cost of the lights in power savings alone in 1.4 years.
From a physical, mechanical and power perspective, 418watts of QB panel solidly outperform 800watts of HPS light, hands down.
Heres what I can tell you about QB light source vs plant growth.
This one is a little bit more difficult for me and heres why. My first grow with the QB boards is growing this GG#4 from Royal Queen seeds. I have never grown the GG#4 before so I have no first hand comparison using HPS vs QB on the same strain. I should have done another run of the White Widow from MJ Seeds that I have grown several times before. That would have given me a better platform to do a comparison of lights vs grow.
What I have done, is studied many similar GG#4 grows both on this forum and elsewhere. If I disregard
@Grandpa Tokin from the high end and the poor grows i've seen from the low end I wind up with some pretty good reference points to work with.
That said and using what information I have for comparison, I would suggest the the QB boards produce a plant that grows better than average size buds. The colas are dense and hard. Trichome production is above average.
So to sum it all up......based on what I've calculated and experienced, I would recommend the use of LED's for lighting and in particular the QB288 boards. They're a great bang for the buck in cannabis growing.