cbdhemp808
Well-Known Member
It would be an easy test, I think. If I were to do this test, I'd use 40g cylindrical smart pots. I'd use identical clones of a photoperiod plant. One plant would be in a pot with dimensions 18" tall by 25.8" wide – the wide pot. The other would be in a pot 25.8" tall by 19.2" wide – the tall pot. Both pots are 40g. The plants would be grown in the same soil mix, same watering schedule, same access to sunlight. They would also receive a high-N liquid fert, let's say every other watering – same amount for each plant. (Note: To create more difference in wide vs. tall, you could use 16" tall by 30" wide for the wide pot.)But I still wonder if Emilya or someone wanted to do a comparative grow, side by side, with tall pots and with wide...
Now things get interesting, because:
• indica-dominant, sativa-dominant, or hybrid?
• exact same amount and frequency of water? or more water for the tall pot?
• should the tall pot be 25.8" tall, or not that tall? If not that tall, why?
What I think would happen...
Let's assume a sativa-dominant plant. I think the wide-pot plant would grow faster and have a wider canopy, and would require less water. (At 100g, the differences would be even more pronounced.)