Thank you for acknowledging it. That's all I care about is honesty and accuracy. It seems difficult to get them to acknowledge errors though. It took a lot of back and forth with different smokesara's in April to get them to verify the original graph for the Epistar 320.
She repeatedly spammed the thread with stock photos of Mars products while simultaneously trying to discredit me; saying I was lying about the purchase date and testing old, depreciated lights, even though she previously PM'd me their light depreciation is less than 3% over 75k hours. A mod had to clean up all the spam, including a bunch of photos she spammed of your first plants grown in skulls. It was a nightmare getting them to admit their graph was not accurate.
Finally,
they released the raw data chart from the engineers and said they would soon test all of their lights that way, given time. That was 9 months ago and I haven't seen them post any other raw charts from the engineers like that. After all that, seeing the new, inaccurate chart for the Epistar 320 on the new website is especially frustrating. They knew back in April that they plotted it inaccurately and made a better chart and
promised to make more better charts. Then they went and made an inaccurate chart. So no, I haven't seen any charts for the new COB and I'm not sure I would trust it if I did.
Any time I bring an issue to their attention it's the same ole thing. Trying to discredit me, ignore it, spam over it, report the posts for deletion, never acknowledging it.