How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ok I am going to buy the
Hydro Grow 126W Penetrator
to replace my
htg supply 120 watt
If I had a DWC setup, and a grow parameter of 29" wide, 20" deep by 2.5 to 3 foot high What Degree Lenses You think I should Get?
Also I would do 2 plants first but what would you sugest?
Also how high should I veg them and should I trim the top more than once?
I have been pretty impressed with what I have seen so far. As a former engineer, I also understand and agree with your notion of spacing the LEDs further apart and then reducing the angle at which they fire their light downward.
I am currently running a dr60 grow tent (60cm x 60cm or 4 square feet total) with 500w of cfls (2x250 red envirloites for flowering). I grow in soil and my last yield with this setup was around 190g from 4 plants vegged for 5 weeks each that finished at a total height of around 90cm per plant.
Assuming all these conditions remain the same (i.e. area, tent, humidity, temp, pH, nutrients, etc.), which model would you recommend to achieve a similar or better yield in the exact same tent with clones of the exact same plant?
Also, I am confused as to why people say things like "covers 4 square feet when positioned 12 inches above the canopy". Surely the height of the plants is a critical variable here! How can square footage be quoted when no data is given on the total height of the plants? Even my school trigonometry seems to indicate that height is important here. Maybe I am just missing something here!
p.s the old 120 watter is getting donated to veg room. All I will use your 126 watt light for is flowering and I have some just about ready.
If your LED pannel is sick though Ill buy more for sure... I will change my avatar to your 126 pannel! lol
Well I thought you may ask this question, because I thought of how great a candidate I would be for it. However I am a little sketchy bout posting stuff like that. So for now I'm not sure on the pics.
On the other hand if I have the same results as my 120 Watt wide lens unit I may call bukakee on you hahahal!!
Trust me I'm not worried about that though, Your answers are excellent and to see you take time and jam out 3-7 paragraphs for everyone's questions is a true sign of enthusiast about your product! IM IN!!
As a former engineer, I also understand and agree with your notion of spacing the LEDs further apart and then reducing the angle at which they fire their light downward.
190G = approximately 7 ounces. Your space is 2' x 2', and you've been running 500W CFL. Due to your space limitations, there aren't a whole lot of options for LED in your grow tent. I guess it really depends on how you use the lights and your tent. If it were me, I would get 5, 63W lights, put one on each side, and one up top. Is it comparable? No...it will give you way higher yields, but that's what I would do. If you're looking to yield close to a half pound, I would go with the 126W, or 2, 63W units.
Hi,
Thanks for the fast response. So you're basically saying that a single 126w light above the 4 plants should yield about the same as my current setup? If that is genuinely the case, I would be very excited. All I need now is some proof from a grow diary. Let me know when this happens, as I have scoured all the online forums and have yet to see anything conclusive.
I am not being critical, I am just natually skeptical! But I am more than willing to be convinced.
These pictures also show the general shape of the light that these rectangular units create, which by the way is round like a UFO.
Just out of curiosity, why does the light throw a round pattern when it's coming through a rectangular lens?
Because the LED's emit light in a round shape The rectangular casing blocks very little light from the outside LED's, and the light engines in our units are also round. So even though the light is square, it makes an ovalish circle area.