How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
last i heard he was in amsterdam and was supposed to return by the 1st of november. I'll be giving him a call this upcoming week to find out what's going on, as i was under the impression that i would have some preliminary results weeks ago.
just a thought that i thought should be considerd can grow support chime in on 420 behalf
OK ... we have a test now same plants same area.Now it needs to be 1 light to 1 light .How is this test going to be as a 190w LED is supose to be the same as a 1000w or 600w HID.Are we going apples to apples,or we going to put 20 LED's in a 4x4 tent with T5 backup.whats the rules?I was told i need 16 light to cover the same area i have now with 2 1000w HPS with movers.
1=same area
2=same strain"clones from same mother"
3=same nutes
4=same number of lights
The big thing with LED is they claim less watts = the same as a bigger watt HID,but there is no conclusive data to support such a claim.If you put more then one light is the area to be tested.The results are skewed.The real question is can a LED stand alone in a full cycle grow"veg to bloom"with no supplemental lighting.120w LED claims to be a 600w HID theres your test'bases on the LED web site".
sooo ummm... no word from Ed yet?
OK ... we have a test now same plants same area.Now it needs to be 1 light to 1 light .How is this test going to be as a 190w LED is supose to be the same as a 1000w or 600w HID.Are we going apples to apples,or we going to put 20 LED's in a 4x4 tent with T5 backup.whats the rules?I was told i need 16 light to cover the same area i have now with 2 1000w HPS with movers.
The big thing with LED is they claim less watts = the same as a bigger watt HID,but there is no conclusive data to support such a claim.
If you put more then one light is the area to be tested.The results are skewed.The real question is can a LED stand alone in a full cycle grow"veg to bloom"with no supplemental lighting.120w LED claims to be a 600w HID theres your test'bases on the LED web site".
TY for chiming in, I think its great if there are even clones and all that sh!t it great a REAL controlled Science EXPERIMENT I will be tuned in FOR SURE. you should try to convince SS for the same thing on behalf of scientific results.
It's not that I don't want to Scooby, it's simply that NO MATTER how many tests, with whatever variables, someone is always going to COMPLAIN that they want it done some way else. There are always those that simply can't find complacency in what is being performed, they only wish to create more drama about what they themselves are not doing, and it tires me. There is a simple reason why I don't carry out the 400W vs 126W grow again: I SOLD MY HIDS, AND NEVER PLAN ON BUYING ANOTHER. Not to mention the 400W would need ventilation, glass, and ducting to even try and compete with the LED... I don't need to do a single side-by-side grow when there are users such as yourself testing a SINGLE 126W unit over several plants. Anyone who knows what a 400W does, can look at your grow and see if it compares, they don't need another unit right beside it to do so. Since you aren't the only 1 testing a 126W, this SINGLE light grow can be cross referenced with other members to verify results.
What upsets me is when people tell me I'm using bait and switch tactics, or when they come on here and misquote everything in relation to our units and how they are rated, and then tells people there is no conclusive data, when this thread is FULL of it! It's almost like a campaign for ignorance with some people, and it bothers me when I have to CONSTANTLY correct them because of it.