- Thread starter
- #101
HydroGrowLED
New Member
Thank you
My friend recently did just over a pound under 2, 126W lights (almost 2grams/watt). I had another customer report just over 4 ounces with the 63W unit (again nearly 2grams/watt). I'm seeing pretty hearty growth in my own garden, though it's kinda hard to get solid numbers on a perpetual cycle.
A 90 degree viewing angle would only increase the intense footprint (the area of highest intensity closest to the light) by about 10%. The intense area doesn't change a whole lot in size, the lens simply throws more light outwards to the edges. I've found it's more efficient to simply use multiple lights, but if someone wanted 90 I could do it. When I switch to Scrog, I'm still going to have plants that are 2' tall, so I'll want the penetration. It's not just about how far it can go into your canopy, it's about how much energy it is able to deliver to the leaf, which has given us more density and longer, thicker colas.
My friend recently did just over a pound under 2, 126W lights (almost 2grams/watt). I had another customer report just over 4 ounces with the 63W unit (again nearly 2grams/watt). I'm seeing pretty hearty growth in my own garden, though it's kinda hard to get solid numbers on a perpetual cycle.
A 90 degree viewing angle would only increase the intense footprint (the area of highest intensity closest to the light) by about 10%. The intense area doesn't change a whole lot in size, the lens simply throws more light outwards to the edges. I've found it's more efficient to simply use multiple lights, but if someone wanted 90 I could do it. When I switch to Scrog, I'm still going to have plants that are 2' tall, so I'll want the penetration. It's not just about how far it can go into your canopy, it's about how much energy it is able to deliver to the leaf, which has given us more density and longer, thicker colas.