Let me reiterate, a watt is NOT heat, a watt is associated with heat in that converting energy "from one form to another over a particular period of time" will generate heat, and that includes turbines and windmills.
heatmiser, indeed you are sensitive. You've said it yourself. And it's not a "strategy." Read your own posts. I quoted wikipedia and you replied saying I was trying to make you look stupid. Here are a few more of your more recent quotes to look at:
"I have seen blogging like this before. A blogger uses the strategy of ad hominem attacks (your too sensitive), and the age old strategy of the chase my semantics game (I maintain that its related to, and its associated with)."
"its best that if your strategy is to cut and paste your way through an argument, you may wish to choose another likeminded person who also doesn't mind being called out as not knowing what he is talking about "
Edit: And by the way, I never said you were sensitive until you admitted it. In any case, we're making different arguments on different interpretations (semantics). It's not worth pursuing this discussion between you and I.
heatmiser, indeed you are sensitive. You've said it yourself. And it's not a "strategy." Read your own posts. I quoted wikipedia and you replied saying I was trying to make you look stupid. Here are a few more of your more recent quotes to look at:
"I have seen blogging like this before. A blogger uses the strategy of ad hominem attacks (your too sensitive), and the age old strategy of the chase my semantics game (I maintain that its related to, and its associated with)."
"its best that if your strategy is to cut and paste your way through an argument, you may wish to choose another likeminded person who also doesn't mind being called out as not knowing what he is talking about "
Edit: And by the way, I never said you were sensitive until you admitted it. In any case, we're making different arguments on different interpretations (semantics). It's not worth pursuing this discussion between you and I.