I run about 600 + watts of LED in a 5 x 5 tent. Running a 400 cfm ventilation fan at about 1/2 speed. Rarely have my temperatures run over 85 degrees even on the hottest days with just the central air as cooling and exhausting the tent into another room. My lights use 3 watt LED which are currently more efficient than a 5 watt LED.
Central air as cooling - That's a hidden cost right there.
My point is that cool air is still a prerequisite for LED lights, more so for units with 5-watt diodes. These units cumulatively breathes hot air like a dragon on bhut jolokia.
I was deluded into thinking that (5w) LEDs run cool - the way I look at it, I might as well just have stuck to HID lights if I still need to cool the ambient air. Caveat: My ambient temp is 82F/70RH. I thought that with LEDs, I could minimise humidifying costs by reducing air exchange. LEDs still run hot, which requires the entire air within the grow area to be exchanged, where the dehumidifier is working double time. at the same time, CO2 is wasted.
Let me reassert this again - if LEDs are marketed as cool-running to customers in warmer parts of the world, do include ports for isolated venting of the hot air as well. This way, growers could better control the air within the grow area. I could cool down the light unit, while minimising the cost for CO2 and dehumification.
I still believe in LEDs. But it's important that LED light companies think from a grower's perspective as well, to better address grave problems with innovatively simple solutions.