I certainly grok thatMebs, but it would be a lot more informative if it had been done with synthetics. I haven't had a chance to read the paper yet but it seems like there are so many moving parts to organic grows that it I feel like it makes conclusions less conclusive.
I too wish that they had done the study with a known synthetic instead of an obscure organic.
I’m thinking that the levels of micros might be intentionally high because chelation and subsequent uptake are iffier with organic sources? So, we might be okay drifting out of “normal” , but probably safer to not get carried away.