Gazoo
Member
LOL, I was musing over my obsession with scifi as a young reader. I read everything that had been published, I think, by the time I hit high school. Heinlein wrote some pretty cheesy stuff - don' know if you read those. I got one of my best early chubbies from Farnham's Freehold.
But he redeemed himself with Stranger, and the Foundation trilogy, etc.
Bradbury, Asimov ... there were some greats in those days. And here I am now, 50 years into that future. We have a lot of the gadgetry that they foresaw, and the culture is similar in many ways to some of their predictions.
[Edit] I was reading scifi when the 9v portable pocket transistor radio, and color television, were the most amazing new "electronics". Stereo HiFis. Touchtone telephones.
As a Teenager in the 70's I was taken with
The Teachings of Don Juan
had I think 4 or 5 in the series. At the time was NOT considered FICTION
"was published by the University of California Press in 1968 as a work of anthropology, though many critics contend that it is a work of fiction. It was written by Carlos Castaneda and submitted as his Master's thesis in the school of Anthropology. It purports to document the events that took place during an apprenticeship with a self-proclaimed Yaqui Indian Sorcerer, don Juan Matus from Sonora, Mexico between 1960 and 1965.
The book is divided into two sections. The first section, The Teachings, is a first-person narrative that documents Castaneda's initial interactions with don Juan. He speaks of his encounters with Mescalito (a teaching spirit inhabiting all peyote plants), divination with lizards and flying using the "yerba del diablo" (lit. "Devil's Weed"; Jimson weed), and turning into a blackbird using "humito" (lit. "little smoke"; a smoked powder containing Psilocybe mexicana). The second, A Structural Analysis, is an attempt, Castaneda says, at "disclos[ing] the internal cohesion and the cogency of don Juan’s Teachings."