Now Doc, I asked a simple question, hoping for a helpful response. In my kindest voice may I suggest that the attitude didn't help. I'll just google it.
In my kindest voice:
You've got exactly one grow under your belt. One.
You come at me all the time with crap like, "What about the synthetics? Has anyone ever researched what they do to the soil?" Or, "Lower humidity and turn up the heat to kill spider mites," you gave that advice to someone on your thread. Luckily I was there to straighten both of you out before the poor guy tried it.
The fact that you even have to ask "Is there any science behind the wet/dry cycle" It seems like it's tradition, not science?" shows that you have no idea what you're talking about.
1. How the hell would you know if there was science or not? You didn't even know how to deal with spider mites and had no idea what "synthetics" are or were. Turns out you were using them yourself without realizing it. But that didn't stop you from coming at me as if I need to validate the science behind my methods to a person like you, with one grow in your resume. Your knowledge of the science is so poor, you had to ask the question.
2. If you truly want to learn the "science" of plant physiology and how they respond to things, by all means do so. But since you admittedly know nothing on the topic, wouldn't it be prudent to not suggest that my methods aren't scientific?
3. What do you base your uninformed opinion on? You have no experience at all! You have one grow. You have gnats.
I love answering questions. I do it a lot. But if ever want me to answer one of yours again, stop projecting your woefully narrow and poor understanding of cannabis cultivation onto me by suggesting many times things that are false regarding what I do, my products and my methods.
That's how we met, is it not? Someone was saying crap on your thread about some company in Australia and ASSuming that company was me. WRONG. And you took that and ran with it to the point of saying my kit was "synthetics." Bullshit. You spouted off with false authority on something you were totally ignorant of.
And there you go again, demanding "studies" to prove that your notion that wet/dry cycles are tradition and not science.
So, please don't lecture me about attitude. I get really sick and tired of being misrepresented by you. I don't appreciate your assumptions that something I'm doing is based on tradition, and not science, as if you are able to discern either.
The reason I had "attitude" is because of what you said. If you had let it lie, I wouldn't have made this post....but you had to lecture me about my attitude and I'm supposed to excuse and tolerate yours?