If mobile users aren't given the option to escape the mobile view- so be it. But in this one regard the switch is really a step backward for me personally. I hope you don't think this is mindless complaining or some 'failure to adapt'. It's not. It's input.
*Duuuuude, from a technical perspective, the way the process works is. You create a hub first, which is the website, work out the kinks, then you customize and build the phone app based on the website, it's not the other way around. You're not letting the hub be created first, you're just early to the party, the DJ's not even here yet.
*Please wait for the mother plant to grow before you take clones from it. That's it. You don't want to take clones from an incomplete mother, you wait till she's a good as she's gonna get. Once they get to this milestone, then phone apps can be made, thus working out the bugs here first, then hopefully avoiding them when the app is made. Because you don't want people complaining when the app is made PREMATURELY.
*Honestly, t's just a process man, just wait in the bleachers like the other spectators and enjoy the view for now. This is history in the making and not a step backward. You just don't know how these projects work, can't blame you, just want to educate you. They would have double the work to update a brand new website AND a phone app. Why duplicate your frustration when they can "get it right" here first. They are doing it the logical way, not the personal way. Hope that helps explain a technical timeline of this magnitude.
*Personally, Ask not what 420 magazine can do for you...but what you can do for 420 magazine.
* Adjust, adapt and move on, like we do everyday in our journals. It's no different, hope that helps.