Wait a minute. 25.5 x 27.5 is 4.87 sqft * 35 = 170.4 watts
You have roughly 175?
You have roughly 175?
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What height is it Derb? I looked at lots of Mars tents and all the ones I’ve seen at the ideal square footage (2.5 x 2.5) are short, like 5’ only. I’ll have another look at their rangeI love my Mars. More green up front for more green harvesting. No light leaks, well built, and when things go wrong you have Sara here on 420
So @Graytail - your answer before, saying I would end up wanting more light with a broader tent; it sounded like you were also saying I could still grow one plant under this light successfully by just having lots of room around it, yes? Just containing its girth within the light area. If so, I’m ok with that, and it would mean that if, in a few years, I wanted to expand the indoor thing a bit, then I’d be well set up for that.
I’m reading a bit more about the camera thing and one technique i was practicing with over summer is using the time delay to do longer exposure shots, to eliminate shutter blur from pushing the button so I should be good. I’ll give it a go tonight and report back. I was too tired last night. Actually, it’s 430 in the morning now, and lights come on on an hour - I’ll see how I feel and maybe give it a go then, before the sun comes up.Those gorilla dimensions are odd, are you saying its 5'8" WITH the 1' extension? That would be very od, heck 5'8 is odd, the 3x3 I found online is 83" tall which is 5'11". I couldn't find a 2.5x3.5 so mine must be 2x2.5, hmmm. It kid looks like you can add more than 1 extension kit. For the pic, maybe try aiming your light right at the leak area....? What shed suggests is a good idea but needs more instructions but that's a great thing to know, it's been a while since I've done it so maybe she'd can elaborate....? It even helps to have a remote so you don't shake the camera when you push the button.
I really did thanks for that!. Also, glad you liked the video.
I don't own a digital SLR but did make a living as a photographer in the film days. We had shutter release cables that screwed into the middle of the shutter button to prevent camera shake. Those exist for digital?What shed suggests is a good idea but needs more instructions but that's a great thing to know, it's been a while since I've done it so maybe she'd can elaborate....? It even helps to have a remote so you don't shake the camera when you push the button.
We had shutter release cables that screwed into the middle of the shutter button to prevent camera shake.
I don't own a digital SLR but did make a living as a photographer in the film days. We had shutter release cables that screwed into the middle of the shutter button to prevent camera shake. Those exist for digital?
If the camera is controlling the amount of time the shutter will be open then I don't think that's necessary when shooting in that kind of very dim light. The fraction of a second shake when you trip the shutter is a tiny percentage of the amount of time the shutter will be open. Any blur happening in that time wouldn't register on the sensor. But if you're using the "bulb" setting to keep the shutter open as long as you held down shutter it will show movement. Then you would need some remote way of triggering the opening and closing of the shutter.
Not already... just took them now! After shed said tripod - 30 seconds... and then the light game on in the the tent so I just got up and did italready had the needed pics.
general spread of light leaking down the sides of the panels.