Aha, but
So CSA is not the same as the standards you have in Canada??? as to get the C it needs to conform to Canadian standards.. Set by the CSA standards body
if it only conforms to US standards you can't put the C.. then it's just whatever testing lab label US. and you can have SA US labels only as well. Tested by CSA laboratories but only conform to US standards.
the C alone is not CSA. it is another standard entirely.
CSA group, Underwriter labs or Tüv Süd are or have nationally recognised testing labs in Canada, US and Germany.
they are accepted but have no testing facilities here at all.
there are independent labs that can test products but they generally have no ability to bestow a certificate.
Like the mark on mine means that Tüv Süd was used as an OSHA approved NRTL to test to US and Canadian requirements. So I'd imagine for compliance the NRTLs have to perform the tests like the CSA labs would to reach the Canadian standard. No? as thats the whole thing with people trying to achieve standards, they develop protocols so those can be achieved across varying groups.
CSA recognizes what those standards are, but the products do not have to be tested in canada. if it achieves the standard set elsewhere, it is agreed there is no need for anything further unless attempting to achieve a full CSA cert.
Or are you saying that the labs the group use in Canada go above and beyond to reach the same standard set by their other body than others to comply to those standards?
CSA standards are ridiculously high. it's the standard used in areonautical and space exploration equipment, or any high stress mission critical component.
Since it's coveted, I'm sure using the actual CSA group might be a more complex, longwinded or expensive process and the mark carries more prestige.
fun fact : it's not even a legal requirement. CSA is almost totally voluntary. it's a huge ask for engineers to work within the standard.