I’m blaming technical difficulties. Said difficulties now resolved, I believe I’ve collected & correctly read a legitimate sample for today.Just to save me a trip to the eye doctor, the reading of 22 on the left is as obvious to everyone as the reading of 12 on the right?
And you're calling that...?
Yes. Using different meters similar to this in industry helped me to remember to use peripheral vision. It's a learned thing. I used to go into chambers with huge generator rotors spinning sometimes at 3960 rpm's and touch a wooden stick to the journal bearing to measure vibration to balance them. A hand held vibrometer was the tool held on the stick to read the width of a beam of light. Walking in there was a trip! Like going into the biggest storm you can imagine! My vision and BP was affected and time in had to be short! Lots of air and vibrations going on! Very cool! Glad to not do that any more!Just to save me a trip to the eye doctor, the reading of 22 on the left is as obvious to everyone as the reading of 12 on the right?
It is not I promise.I guess it ain't nuthin' but a Gee thang.
I'd call it a fuzzy 17 . The fuzz is killing you. If we had a progressively fuzzier set of pics it may put you on it better. It's kind of like figuring a math problem. We have to have a base of understanding. 16 to 18 would be the zone I'd accept because people's eyes are a little different. It's interpretation.And you're calling that...?
16-17And you're calling that...?
@InTheShed Here’s one with a more distinct line. This sample came from Pure Kush #2. I gave her 1/2 tsp of BSM with her watering this morning. All she needs is a little bump & less calcium (I think).
I meant to say more calcium…@InTheShed Here’s one with a more distinct line. This sample came from Pure Kush #2. I gave her 1/2 tsp of BSM with her watering this morning. All she needs is a little bump & less calcium (I think).
