SurfBuddy
Well-Known Member
Excuses, excuses LOLBut with the new light, I really *have to* do this because I can't take pics and get accurate color with the Sun blazing in there!
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Excuses, excuses LOLBut with the new light, I really *have to* do this because I can't take pics and get accurate color with the Sun blazing in there!
Excuses, excuses LOL
Hey... If I can validate my opening 10 minutes to 7, it's all for the better! Besides, would you like to see pictures like this
Or like this:
I leave it to you to decide...
Oh the first one is the bestest! I used to have to peek in and acted like ya' did, like the plants can't be left alone. The best part is when I would come in and look at the plants and notice how much some had grown over night. Literally saw 3-4" growth since I last looked in on them. I have finally dulled out to the miracle, and have become desensitized, knowing what to expect. Then this becomes more of a job. Although I still marvel at the vigor some plants show...
Fun job though
I want B, no HPS photos, regardless of when you take them
There has to be a filter we can use to take photos with the HPS lights on. I am in San Jose, CA where we have a huge telescope that some rich guy donated to the government around the turn of the last century (1900's). The entire city uses HPS street lights (yes, I've thought about baskets hanging from every street light, LOL). This is to be able to filter that one light spectrum out, so the Astronomers could still see out at night. The entire city is under a haze of that orange/yellow spectrum. Perhaps that's why my hair grows so much at night! Anyway, Jandre2k3, they're sure lookin' super great!!!
Hi Jandre. About the Cloning Test.
Well done my friend. You should be in a lab somewhere. Based on reading many comparable ways of cloning, you did a fine job. The fact that only one strain did not root was not what I expected. Bravo.
You stated that you thought that using a cloning solution would somehow make the cuttings be weaker. Why is that? Since I never clone, I would use all the help that I could get. Just nosy.
HEY OMM! I'm sorry, I didn't intend to imply that rooting hormone would make the cuttings weaker. What I meant to say was that I think that maybe a weaker cutting that I would possibly cull, might be forced to root because of the hormone, and because of that might not turn out to be as vigorous as I would like. I have noticed several cuttings, while making my clone army to drive the SOG, that under perform and lack that "oomph" like I'm looking for in a clone.
What I'm thinking, here, is that maybe if I stop using rooting hormone altogether, I will start off with the strongest cuttings from the gate, and have to selectively cull less when it comes time to transfer to the box. This is an exciting prospect for me because I tend to try to baby those that have stalled and take up precious space in K-8 (veg bin), instead of devoting that space to the strongest and most vigorous. If I could force myself to accept the fact that, either I need to better my method of cutting, or to stop nursing along under performers, I think I would have better success in the box when it comes time to harvest.
Totals Recap
Purple Mr. NiceMain Plant = 14.2g
Shitz&Gigulz = 4.9gTOTAL 19.1g (0.67oz)
Jandre KushHarvest 1:2.25oz smoke5g Grade "A" hash (73 micron bag) dark yellow in color
9g Grade "B" hash (160 micron bag) yellowish-green color
Harvest 275g smoke9g Grade "A" hash (73 micron bag) dark yellow in color12g Grade "B" hash (160 micron bag) yellowish-green color
Harvest 318.25g smoke
Harvest 428.5g smokeHarvest 3 and 4 combined6g Grade "A" hash (73 micron bag) dark yellow in color8g Grade "B" hash (160 micron bag) yellowish-green colorjandre Kush Total:
185.75g (6.5oz) total for jandre Kush
20g Grade "A" hash (73 micron bag) dark yellow in color
29g Grade "B" hash (160 micron bag) yellowish-green color
7.17 oz in a 2x4x4 box.... and that's with MITE DAMAGE...
0.71 oz Grade "A" hash (73 micron bag) dark yellow in color
1.07 oz Grade "B" hash (160 micron bag) yellowish-green color
Arguably, the hash total would have been lower if the sparse growth hadn't happened during the infestation, and following treatment.
I could feasibly say that 9-12 oz per box would be the norm in an SOG-type run. Although it takes a little timing, better than I showed, it's a lot easier than everyone else makes it out to be. Sure, I have an automatic watering system set up, and all my lights and fans are on timers, but basically, I only watched them for 2 months with the exception of the 22/45 defoliation.
The 400w HPS performed considerably better than the previous set-up, and I will now go on record as saying:
The heat output is relatively the same as stacking several HO T5 to get the same lumen/PAR output as a HPS. The only conceivable advantage to stacking T5's is that they can be bought separately ($30 Each 24" fixture) as single fixtures over an extended time, for less than the initial set-up of a HPS rig ($200 for an okay rig), but in the end, you will end up paying a lot more to equal the same strength as the HPS. Also, once you add several HO T5's to get the same Lumen/PAR output as a HPS, your wattage (24w for 24" and 54w for 48" EACH!!!) will be MUCH higher."HPS by far outweighs the HO T5 in all respects when considering a cannabis growing operation."
"Math!" you say?
24w HO T5 lumen output 1,880
400w HPS lumen output 55,000
To equal just the lumen output, you'd need 30 HO T5's . . . 55,000 divide 1,880 equals 29.25531914893617
Now 30 lights x 24w each equals a whopping 720 watts.
So you'd need and EXTRA 320 watts from the T5 to equal the same output from the HPS.... Need I say more??
That said, if you wish use T5's, you will eventually pay for it in the end in sub-par flower and bud production, and the reduced potency of the THC in what trichomes are created if you stopped adding T5's at 400w, and higher electricity bills by adding T5's to get the same output as a 400w HPS.
The added CO2 received in the transition and early flower(stopped after week 7 as per instructions), really added bulk and strength to the stems. The flowers, however, I noticed very little, if any difference. Since the flowers mature in the final weeks of flower, and therefore received no enrichment in the final stages, there really is no way that it really could have helped much. I can say that CO2 Enrichment did add to the health, and overall vigor of the plants treated. I also noticed a more dense stacking of nodes during the growth in flower, and a lot more flower sites than the previous runs without CO2.
84.5 days VEG tracking Green Kush Bunnies - GKB
Don't have a whole lot of time, so just a quick pick update. This is a little weird only having two plants to update... so here they are.
Color's a little off because I didn't have time to set up the light properly.
Anyway, here they are.
Side A:
Side B:
The Ebb & Flow I use is in the Cardboard Flower Box enough to support 2 plants veg/flower for an entire year. These 2 bustubs each are 19x15x6 (in inches) so in total you're looking at 1710 in3. 1 Gallon [Fluid, US] = 231 Cubic Inches so 1710/231= 7.4 USGal. in volume, and there are two of those tubs in the box. so 15 Gal total volume to hold 2 plants (In a ScrOG configuration).Dude wow, you come along way . I been following ya from the start.
I have a question for you but first.............
I would like to dispose of the round 3 and 5 gal buckets I am using and replace them with 10 gal tote. 1-2 plants each lst/scrog
I intend to run a 60 day veg then what ever the lady needs for flower.Lst from the get go to be approximately 4 - 6" tall but create a 2x2-4x4 canopy
In your opinion would the ebb n flow you use be enough room for a 120+ day grow ?