Omg your Coca-Cola’s are STACKED!
And to follow on from GD Black, I’ve found just the bottle for girls to pee. Even comes in pink
And to follow on from GD Black, I’ve found just the bottle for girls to pee. Even comes in pink
Testing The ViparSpectra XS1000 With VetSmoke85
- Thread starter VetSmoke85
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #1,322
That'll catch the runoff nicely.Omg your Coca-Cola’s are STACKED!
And to follow on from GD Black, I’ve found just the bottle for girls to pee. Even comes in pink
- Thread starter
- #1,323
Decided to save myself a few pennies and put both plants under 1 light to finish off. I checked the PPFD under the light after switching one off and got a noticeable drop in the readings. The light hadn't moved at that point. Added to my belief that you can't really compare 2 lights side by side in one tent. Would be very difficult not to have spillover skewing results anyway.
Your buds are always so fucking stacked!
What she said ^^
- Thread starter
- #1,326
It's just good photos. Easier to get them looking that way when they're small I reckon.
Vet, First, if in doubt on glue integrity use JB Weld high tensile strength 2 part thickened epoxy…I guarantee total impervious and tenacious bond. What is the dimension of that tray and where did you buy. Cheer#Made the drainage table for the next journal. Glued some plinth feet on and put a drain tube in the front. Hoping the glue stays strong.
Here's how it will look with the 5 buckets in.
- Thread starter
- #1,328
Thanks mate. Seems solid enough but I still haven't had time to test it under any weight yet. The tray is 60x60cm and I got it on eBay. If you search Garland tray you'll find them somewhere.
Listersmeghead
Well-Known Member
Morning Vet.
The 80×80 I've got can sag a little in the centre when under weight, hopefully your 60×60 is more rigid. It may need an extra prop/leg in the centre when plants are big, to maintain the flow level to the drainage hole.
The 80×80 I've got can sag a little in the centre when under weight, hopefully your 60×60 is more rigid. It may need an extra prop/leg in the centre when plants are big, to maintain the flow level to the drainage hole.
- Thread starter
- #1,330
Thanks bud. I did notice that about it. I'll find something to support it under the middle.Morning Vet.
The 80×80 I've got can sag a little in the centre when under weight, hopefully your 60×60 is more rigid. It may need an extra prop/leg in the centre when plants are big, to maintain the flow level to the drainage hole.
- Thread starter
- #1,331
I thought maybe one of them would come down this weekend but they're getting longer. So close. It's killing me.
Beautiful Vet!
You're a patient man, Vet!
It'll definitely be worth the wait- lots of great weed on those pretty ladies!
It'll definitely be worth the wait- lots of great weed on those pretty ladies!
While we wait, let's ponder how different the leave look give the identical conditions! And how fat the flowers are on both.
What else do we have to do?
What else do we have to do?
- Thread starter
- #1,336
Indeed! All I can say really is it's a visual example of how different strains have different needs. Which we all know anyway, but it's here in pictures. Will be interesting doing the 5 strains on the next run.While we wait, let's ponder how different the leave look give the identical conditions! And how fat the flowers are on both.
What else do we have to do?
I fed them both a couple of days ago and the pineapple express bucket is feeling about ready for some more. The Blueberry feels like it's barely drunk anything so shes looking like the first to the finish line.
Listersmeghead
Well-Known Member
Our hard water plays a big part in the difference i believe, I found out my tap water contains 250ml calcium carbonates per litre...PER LITRE
The crafty buggers are hiding the magnesium levels from me on the website....but I'm on to them..
I believe the calcium to magnesium ratio wants to be around 3:1. In most hard water areas in the uk this is way off. Which in my case the high calcium starts reacting bad with the PK.
I've found a uk company (growers ark) that will test your tap water exactly . It is an extra expense (£30) but I'm interested to know what's going on if using tap water and adjust accordingly.
I'm also stoned, so forgive the waffle
The crafty buggers are hiding the magnesium levels from me on the website....but I'm on to them..
I believe the calcium to magnesium ratio wants to be around 3:1. In most hard water areas in the uk this is way off. Which in my case the high calcium starts reacting bad with the PK.
I've found a uk company (growers ark) that will test your tap water exactly . It is an extra expense (£30) but I'm interested to know what's going on if using tap water and adjust accordingly.
I'm also stoned, so forgive the waffle
- Thread starter
- #1,338
Report here says Calcium is 292ppm and Magnesium is 2.4ppm.Our hard water plays a big part in the difference i believe, I found out my tap water contains 250ml calcium carbonates per litre...PER LITRE
The crafty buggers are hiding the magnesium levels from me on the website....but I'm on to them..
I believe the calcium to magnesium ratio wants to be around 3:1. In most hard water areas in the uk this is way off. Which in my case the high calcium starts reacting bad with the PK.
I've found a uk company (growers ark) that will test your tap water exactly . It is an extra expense (£30) but I'm interested to know what's going on if using tap water and adjust accordingly.
I'm also stoned, so forgive the waffle
Maybe I'll have to start putting the water through a basic filter at least. Definitely going to try nutrients made for hard water though and see what difference that makes.
- Thread starter
- #1,339
Damn! Is there any water in that water?
