Just noticed the mistake. It should read "it is for regular seeds and not for feminized seeds".OK, I found it the link and here are some of the high points. This is for feminized seeds and not regular seeds.
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just noticed the mistake. It should read "it is for regular seeds and not for feminized seeds".OK, I found it the link and here are some of the high points. This is for feminized seeds and not regular seeds.
We can experiment with it if you have time and space. Label them and sprout it. Lets see if the theory hold true.Something I found today while doing research for my first hypothetical grow:
So, I laid out my hypothetical bag seeds that I plan to use for my first hypothetical grow (ramping up, will start a journal at the appropriate time):
If I am reading this right, the top row are all female. The first two in the bottom row I believe are male. The last two in that row I do not believe are even viable. They look a little crushed or malformed. These seeds came from reggie/brickweed.
Does this sound about right? Comments?
We can experiment with it if you have time and space. Label them and sprout it. Lets see if the theory hold true.
I'm curious to try this one in future.
Yes there are places that do testing but, I'm cheap and don't want to spend $15-20 per plant on testing for bag seeds. I run 12 plants and if I paid for all at $15 ea it would run $180 per year or more.Look up SteepHill or Phylos. They do gender testing on seedling as young as 2 weeks. Just need a little hole punch sized piece of leaf. I've used both and can vouch for them. Around $15 a plant.
I totally agree, I would much rather just put that money into some good fem seeds and let the grow begin.I understand. I only use fem seeds now for that reason. If I were to happen upon some reg seeds that I really wanted, I would have to do the testing because of plant limits, I couldn't afford to wait until they show sex.
I tried this approach too, but I only came out with a 50/50 result for 4 seeds germinated. But afterwards I was told by someone who had more consistent success, that most important in his mind was the overall 'roundness' of the seed, to him the crater was less important. That parallels something I read a long time ago, where someone said to find female seeds out of regular seeds, they should roll them down a slope and the ones that rolled the straightest were deemed to be the most likely to be female. But anyway, I am all for experimentation as it seems there is no loss to have a go. I would try again when I next germinate regular seeds, altho like others, feminized seeds make it easier for me.Like I said I did this for fun and with an open mind.
Hey Stunger, I have had good results with this method but my sample is way too small to make any real claims. I am 5 for 5 at the moment 4x female and 1x male.In my current Quadlining Balcony grow using regular seeds, I felt there was nothing to lose in trying this out, so I selected 4 seeds based on this 'crater' theory (closeup pics of the seeds in my current Quadlining balcony grow). I now have 2 confirmed females (pistils developing), and 2 suspected males (I am waiting for multiple balls to develop for absolute confirmation). Possibly the 'crater' seeds I selected were not up to the theory's standard. But anyway, the result looks like only 50/50 from my tiny trial of 4 seeds.