Re: Green Dreamz - Multi-Strain - Multi-Media - Multi-LED - Grow
Couldn't be that good...I can't see no funny typing
Good morning GD,
+1 BAR....I'm with you mate, I want a good high, not wiped out...mostly
....and I don't want to increase tolerance...and there's so many different varieties and all that for type of high...ddamn pulled a wrist hammy!
...damn sure like to try it once for fun though....
Hey there Tassie.....glad to see you out and about my friend
Have you got ants in your pants? It's not like you to be so active
I vaped that wax and it got me nice, but not as fooked up as last night
......was right where i needed it to get some stuff done
the wax erases pain, makes us young again man.
Very well said Jinn......that is what it did for me today......yes i got a really good buzz, but most importantly it made my body more functional and willing to get things done that would normally take a couple of days
I hear you also Jinn. Using cannabis for meds as opposed to getting high is a whole different ballgame. I'm fortunate to still be living pain free in this old abused body.
Dont get me wrong.....i love getting high
......very much so, but it is first and foremost medicine......i have had over 12 or 13 surgeries putting things back together or back where they were suppose to be
lol.....so good medicinal weed does wonders for me, but when i worked it was a different story.....being retired affords me the benefit of being pain free most of the day.....
but just pain free......dont need to have a buzz but enjoy it none the less
I can't remember whose thread this is now. Oh, hey GDreamz!
Sounds like you've been busy. Are your new strips up? I didn't see. I'm eyeing new lights. Yours have been nominated by a respected source.
How's the co-grow going?
Hey Cajun....the co-grow is growing awesome.......LB is showing that she is the true grower in the family, but thats alright i still support her
lol.....yeah i got the strips yesterday.......go back a page or two and i took pics and also some after i put two of them up.....still deciding the fate of the 3 and last one
......i love them so far......well made......waterproof.......top bin osrams.....virtually no heat.....the only thing i have negative to say that i havent yet is that they need better hanging options.....i am using mine as horizontal side lighting and they seem to be more for hanging over the top of the plants, but was an easy fix with zip ties and 550 cord
.....and i can raise or lower them with ease
Me either BAR. That is until you manipulate it and concentrate it. Coca and poppy are harmless plants until they're concentrated through a very similar process to making wax or shatter.
I'm just saying that it's something to be aware of and will most likely be the downfall of legalization.
Wow I'm a total bummer today. Sorry all.
I'm done with my negative vibes now.
Happy Friday all.
Hopefully your wrong about the downfall, but i have heard issues with the concentrates and even heard of two cases of overdose from edibles i believe.......it was on the reality show Pot Barons of Colorado
.....have you got to check it out yet Doc?
Oh yeah i wanted to tell you that i talked to the owner again from my new lights and asked him about the hanging distance reccomendations........he said what it is is that they underdrive the 3 watt osrams....they are driven for efficiency......it has to do with the ppf and ppfd which is very interesting.....now i dont remember all of it, but it is published on thier website, but it has to do with the actual photons reaching the canopy........nevermind....i found this and thought that it would be good for all of us to take a look at.....gives a different perspective on comparing lights and companies......anyway i hope some of you find it usefull
[h=2]HOW TO COMPARE GROW LIGHTS[/h]
[h=3]NOTE:[/h]If you are not familiar with the differences in PAR, PPF and PPFD — please read our article first to get the most out of the rest of the information provided here.
As a refresher, PAR (Photosynthetically Active Radiation) simply means the light a fixture emits will promote photosynthesis in a plant. Important - PAR is not a metric; it is simply a type of light. PPF (Photosynthetic Photon Flux) is a critical metric that tells us how much light a fixture emits. It doesn't measure the intensity at any location, but it tells us how many photos are coming out of the light every second. PPFD (Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density) tells us how much light is falling on a very specific location (i.e a specific leaf on your plant) every second. If you have a PAR meter, it is reporting PPFD (μmol/m2/s) measurements. You must understand the differences in these metrics before you can compare various horticulture lighting systems. Many manufacturers realize this can be a confusion topic, so it is very easy for companies to mislead consumers by showing a limited set of metrics. However, once you understand the differences in these metrics, you will be able to cut through all of the 'marketing' and 'hype' and ask manufacturers to provide all of the metrics you need to successfully compare lighting fixtures.
Let's face it: comparing various horticulture lighting systems can be a very difficult task. This is especially true due to the amount of exaggerated marketing claims, misleading information and blatantly wrong metrics that are common in the horticulture lighting industry. Hence, we decided to publish a quick guide to help you compare the various lighting solutions on the market. By following these guidelines and asking manufacturers these questions, we believe you be in a much better position to find a horticulture lighting solution that meets your needs.
OK, in order to explain the correct method for evaluating a horticulture lighting system, let's start by highlighting the metrics you should never use when comparing horticulture lighting systems.
DON'T Do The Following:
RULE NUMBER 1
Don't use electrical watts to compare grow lights
RULE NUMBER 2
Don't use Lumens to compare grow lights
RULE NUMBER 3
Don't be fooled by a company that claims to have a magical growth spectrum
RULE NUMBER 4
Don't just look at a single PAR (PPFD) measurement directly under the fixture
RULE NUMBER 5
Don't focus on the wattage of the LED used in the fixture (1W, 3W, 5W, etc.)
In general, if you see a company using any of the above items to promote their horticulture lights, run away and don't look back. Neither of these metrics, nor their derivatives, tell you anything about the performance of a horticulture lighting system.
RULE NUMBER 1 Many people use total electrical watts, $/watt or watt/square foot to compare horticulture lighting systems, but these metrics are 100% useless and will most likely lead a consumer to make a poor purchase decision. Why? Simple. Electricity doesn't grow plants. Furthermore, radiometric efficiency (how much light a fixture emits per watt of electricity) can vary by up to 200% amongst the popular LED fixtures on the market today. Hence, since light (not electricity) grows plants, you need to ask how much light a fixture emits. It sounds simple, but 99.9% of horticulture lighting companies do not advertise this metric. Instead, they focus on electrical watts. Why? Because it is very hard to design an efficient lighting system that delivers high light levels (measured in μmol/Joule), and it is very easy to build an inefficient lighting system that consumes a lot of electricity. High efficiency LEDs, power supplies and optics cost more than less efficient components, and many manufacturers use lower quality components to increase profit margins. To reinfornce Rule #1, let's compare two lighting systems using a real-world example.
Let's assume fixture A consumes 333 watts and Fixture B consumes 430 watts. Fixture A costs $1000 and Fixture B costs $1300. By only looking at the electrical watts of each fixture, many consumes would assume Fixture B is a better fixture. After all, the $/Watt is $3 for both fixtures, and many people assume higher wattage lights are better for growing plants. (See Figure 1)
However, since Fixture A is 100% more efficient than Fixture B, Fixture A actually delivers 54% more light to the plants, despite costing 23% less than Fixture B. While it may be hard to believe, people who purchase Fixture A actually pay 50% less per unit of photosynthetically active light (PPF) than if they had purchased Fixture B. (See Figure 2)
Remember...You are not buying a lighting fixture. You are buying a system that delivers light to grow your plants, so a quantitative measure of light is the only relevant metric you should use to compare horticulture lighting solutions.