I wouldn't consider Fero or Grow Northern leaders... they are cidly resellers at best.
It's all relative. They charge top-tier prices. They spent resources developing spectrum and ratios. Fero has gone into great detail why they made their choices, and why they've remained with them. Grow Northern developed it's new "Rebel" modules. They published those details from the beginning.
Choosing to use a commoditized light fixture (Cidly) doesn't diminish their investment in "blend of light food." In fact, their commoditized fixture/components
reduces what makes them unique -- adding to any incentive to differentiate themselves through the allusion of a "secret sauce."
Area 51 took a lot of heat for stealing their spectra from members of the riu forums.
People shared ideas, learned from each other, and contributed to the evolution of technology -- all on a
public forum -- and they're sore that someone monetized that public information, and makes their ongoing spectrum choices
public? That's "stealing?"
Doesn't that sound a lot like the absurdity of denying a consumer the knowledge of what they're feeding their plants (because "I need to pretend a mysterious edge exists to sell my product" -- while the consumer could dissemble the light and examine the components)?
You can analysis anything and find out what it's made from. Yes Miracle grow will tell you what the level of nuits are... but they are not going to tell you how they made them water soluble or time released etc.
And an lighting manufactuer (such as those who manufacture HPS) may not share their manufacturing techniques, source suppliers nor their research which guided them to a certain color curve. But, they don't hide that curve. They openly publish it so consumers can make an informed decision about what they're being asked to "feed" their plant.
The spectra is what separates one company from another.
Service, integrity, trading relationships and reputation are what separates one company from another. Manufacturing processes which affect longevity, etc. Claiming to maintain a "secret" when one doesn't exist is self-deception. It does a disservice to a company's reputation -- not enhance it.
I have spent years of my time and tens of thousands of dollars of my own money testing what ratios of LEDs work the best. I would be highly upset if someone was to give my spectra out without repaying me for my time and effort.
That's your right. If you sold lights it would be my right to choose to support other sellers who are more transparent about things that aren't, by definition, opaque.
I appreciate your contribution to testing and advancing the technology. But, there are many who have spent
relatively precious resources (time and money) learning to grow -- and proceed to share the fruits of that investment with newbies. We're a community and pretending a measurable, identifiable, discoverable piece of knowledge is "secret" doesn't do anything for the community. It's a long established trend that color spectrums (or ratios) are published -- going back to HPS bubs.
Having said that, I'll repeat that I'd like to hear from Sara if this is TopLED's position. I believe you and I have explored our differences sufficiently.
Best regards, and again, thank you for what you've done to advance the community. No disrespect has been intended.