- Thread starter
- #2,121
Mars Hydro
420 Sponsor
Dear all our website system have problem but the service company on holiday they will fix it on 7th
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It does - Thanks!
Dear all our website system have problem but the service company on holiday they will fix it on 7th
Thank you for your reply... I appreciate your time, and helping another member understand something is never a waste of time. We are all here to learn and grow as a 420 proud community. Even though I don't agree, I wanted to see your reasoning behind your opinion and I appreciate it.
Just to let you envision my idea better, regardless of the "shape" of the light output, we both can agree that with either shape, intensity is lost on the edges of the light footprint. Both LED and HID, as par test comparisons show this effect. Now when working inside this footprint (whether circle or square), due to the square inverse law, each time you double the distance away from a light source, the intensity goes down 1/4. So directly below your light you are getting much more Par Umol/lumens than on the outsides of the light footprint. So like I mentioned, regardless of the "shape" of the output, with both lights dimming near the boundary of the light footprint, wouldn't it gain intensity by bringing it closer to the light due to decreasing the distance to the light source (within the light footprint)?
This is the way I see it, right or wrong, to me it makes perfect common sense as well. Either way I appreciate your input and hope that my more elaborate description also explains why my theory isn't so far off either. Either way, v=scrog or scrog or whatever, Lets all grow some dank and medicate the world! peace my friend
Thank you for your reply... I appreciate your time, and helping another member understand something is never a waste of time. We are all here to learn and grow as a 420 proud community. Even though I don't agree, I wanted to see your reasoning behind your opinion and I appreciate it.
Just to let you envision my idea better, regardless of the "shape" of the light output, we both can agree that with either shape, intensity is lost on the edges of the light footprint. Both LED and HID, as par test comparisons show this effect. Now when working inside this footprint (whether circle or square), due to the square inverse law, each time you double the distance away from a light source, the intensity goes down 1/4. So directly below your light you are getting much more Par Umol/lumens than on the outsides of the light footprint. So like I mentioned, regardless of the "shape" of the output, with both lights dimming near the boundary of the light footprint, wouldn't it gain intensity by bringing it closer to the light due to decreasing the distance to the light source (within the light footprint)?
This is the way I see it, right or wrong, to me it makes perfect common sense as well. Either way I appreciate your input and hope that my more elaborate description also explains why my theory isn't so far off either. Either way, v=scrog or scrog or whatever, Lets all grow some dank and medicate the world! peace my friend
Thanks for all your help and information on these forums and Youtube Icemud, even though I tend to disagree with you on this subject, im sure I speak for many others when I say your journals and posts are really useful to us new growers. Cheers
I would simplify it even more than either of you and say that, in theory, LED beats HID in the one major aspect that I'm interested in, and that's less heat radiated at ANY distance, allowing it to be closer to the plant and delivering more light. The only restriction on that advantage would be footprint size, which is why I plan to spread my particular grow (3 plants at a time) area with 3 lights, but all close enough for each plant to share some of the other two's light. I can get my lights closer to the plants than I could with the one high-watt HID, and even with less watts drawn, can get more light to each plant, increasing the yield. (And hopefully, decreasing cooling costs.)
I would simplify it even more than either of you and say that, in theory, LED beats HID in the one major aspect that I'm interested in, and that's less heat radiated at ANY distance, allowing it to be closer to the plant and delivering more light. The only restriction on that advantage would be footprint size, which is why I plan to spread my particular grow (3 plants at a time) area with 3 lights, but all close enough for each plant to share some of the other two's light. I can get my lights closer to the plants than I could with the one high-watt HID, and even with less watts drawn, can get more light to each plant, increasing the yield. (And hopefully, decreasing cooling costs.)
I would be careful with your theory that can have plants closer. Yes the heat output is not there compared to the HPS, but I have noticed a weird thing going on with my plants when too close to light for to long, they start showing yellowing of leaves that looks like what a MG def. is, but I am pretty sure it the LED form of light burn. I am going with the philosophy of mounting the lights on ceiling of tent and letting plants grow up to them.
I will try and remember to post pic when I get home of this.
Thanks for all your help and information on these forums and Youtube Icemud, even though I tend to disagree with you on this subject, im sure I speak for many others when I say your journals and posts are really useful to us new growers. Cheers
I would be careful with your theory that can have plants closer. Yes the heat output is not there compared to the HPS, but I have noticed a weird thing going on with my plants when too close to light for to long, they start showing yellowing of leaves that looks like what a MG def. is, but I am pretty sure it the LED form of light burn. I am going with the philosophy of mounting the lights on ceiling of tent and letting plants grow up to them.
I will try and remember to post pic when I get home of this.
I plan to use the reflector series for both veg and flower. I'm building my growroom 1m x 1m and I'm flexible with height until 2.60 m.
What model covers my room better?
How much height should i give my growroom to be ok with the light ?
PS : Why 144x3w panel has 3 fans and 192x3w has 2 ?
larger fans on the 192x3w.......PS : Why 144x3w panel has 3 fans and 192x3w has 2 ?
when i get up the website fixed thanks for partner company engineer working over time fixed it. place your order now my dear friends here
Hi kb. Sara is usually not on here until about 9pm but I'm sure she will answer as soon as she can and she will take the order from you without the site being up. I have bought 4 from her and have never gone through the web site..........when can i order a mars 700 flowering spectrum?