Exactly Shed -- in relevance to baking a cake as to decarbing in final evaporation stage and temp -- no matter how long the cake is left in the oven at 175 it just "wont bake" .. It won t (meaning will not) decarb in relation to practical use of time.. any molecule will degrade over time
Az -- most here (and I may just be speaking of myself) are just plain ol users turned growers for economics sake.. I myself buy good stock seed -- stick it in the dirt and it grows , as anyone here has seen my pics , it grows pretty damn good...
Few if any here have ready access to testing facilities so we can intermittently interrupt and test our progress - most here want the most bang for his / her work -- the buzzzzz and if the side benefits help with other ailments the more the better...
Physics -- once again that pesky thing -- alcohol boils at 172-173 degrees -- water boils at 213 degrees -- The bubbles in the final stage are the alcohol -- if evaporating at lets say 180 -- the water remains water IF ANY and no bubbles.. Water cannot be converted into its gaseous state at this low temp -- Like cousin Vinnie said - PHYSICS . Everywhere I've read it is stated to keep any eye on the temp during this final stage in order not to burn the final product. Who is running his / her distiller above 200 degrees? . The absence of bubbles means no more alcohol -- where are you reading Az that these relate to the cbd cooking off ??? As of yet you haven't provided any references in print that support what you keep claiming. obviously you're referencing something from somewhere - just where is this vat of knowledge located?
Plus where is the water coming from Az? -- if using food grade alcohol , it's pure alcohol. Plus if using store bought grain alcohol eventually through the distillation process over time the water will have been removed because only the alcohol will distill off leaving the water in the final oil - if any - plus if reused it is pure alcohol.
Now the whole premise of this discussion was what was originally claimed that "there wasn't any need to decarb the flower prior to extraction" BECAUSE decarb was claimed to have occurred during the solvent recovery process and by the statements here that is not "practically" possible and the resultant oil cannot be decarbed. I can only imagine that there would be no distiller employed and the tincture be allowed to reduce due to evaporation over an exhaustingly long period of time... and that is not what was originally purported to have occurred!!!
So we all "kinda" agree - decarb the flower first
Happy Growing
MotaMan