Re: 420 Consumer Reports Competition - Haight Solid State vs. Hydro Grow LED
i agree 100%. if the light has 126 leds on it and is called a 126w then i am gonna count 126w! the fans on HID are an option and arnt needed to make the light work. plus its hard to count 114w of the vent fan when that was the growers choice to get a fan that runs that much power, they come in all shapes and sizes and different watts. the leds you dont have a choice and they are needed to run the lights, plus their allot smaller fans that only drawl maybe a few watts. plus with leds you still need to run a intake and exhaust fan to get the best results.
when i brought all of this up i was in no way trying to start a war, i thought i missed something and i couldn't figure out how 1.03gpw came up, then once i realized how it was thought of, i was wondering others opinions on this? thats the best part of this forum we can all talk things out and learn different ways of looking at things.
great feed back everyone. you guys ROCK!
I too agree that to try to calculate true usage gets ridiculous. And again, this was a side by side comp of two LEDs so much of this discussion is superfluous. But, that having been said, the fans used to cool a led are different in my opinion than the cooling required for an HID. The reason being that the fans for an HID are optional.
Those in the LED are allocated only to the LED and draw power any time the light is on.
Fans for an HID may or may not be on when the light is on, and they are most likely doing more than one thing - ie. cooling, venting and carbon filter on one fan.
So yes, when I go to figure out how much electricity I'm using on my HID, I absolutely try to figure in for the extra used for the fans and cooling. But there is no way I would expect an HID manufacturer to include a number for the fan because they have no idea which fan I will use. OR even if I will use any at all - plenty of HID lights don't even have glass.
Not the case with an LED.
So when I look at a rating - I want that number to mean something. The LED guys claim you won't need supplemental cooling if you run their light. Good. Do they require the fans to run? Yes? Then you must include that electricity to compare their light's electricity to any other.
HID users know that there are all kinds of hidden costs. Even down to the gauge of wire in the power cord. LED manufacturers and users keep trying to pretend like those costs aren't there.
MANUFACTURERS - PLEASE USE REAL NUMBERS!!! YOU WILL BE FOUND OUT IF YOU TRY TO FUDGE IT !!
i agree 100%. if the light has 126 leds on it and is called a 126w then i am gonna count 126w! the fans on HID are an option and arnt needed to make the light work. plus its hard to count 114w of the vent fan when that was the growers choice to get a fan that runs that much power, they come in all shapes and sizes and different watts. the leds you dont have a choice and they are needed to run the lights, plus their allot smaller fans that only drawl maybe a few watts. plus with leds you still need to run a intake and exhaust fan to get the best results.
when i brought all of this up i was in no way trying to start a war, i thought i missed something and i couldn't figure out how 1.03gpw came up, then once i realized how it was thought of, i was wondering others opinions on this? thats the best part of this forum we can all talk things out and learn different ways of looking at things.
great feed back everyone. you guys ROCK!